Re: [VOTE] was Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate log4j-concurrent from sandbox to trunk

[Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>]

+1.

Yoav

On 7/21/06, Elias Ross <er...@m-qube.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:09 -0700, Elias Ross wrote:
>
> > This should get you the source.
> >
> > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox/log4j/concurrent log4j-concurrent
> >
> > I'd like to put out a vote in the next week.  I would appreciate your
> > help.
>
> Okay, now that it's "next week" I'm calling for a vote for the migration
> of the concurrent library to trunk. :-)
>
> Please answer with 1 or 0 and your choice of + and - symbols.
>
> [Why?  1. Provides deadlock-free appenders.  2. Provides a base for
> appenders that could benefit from concurrency, e.g. those that do I/O.
> 3. Could serve as a basis for the Log4j 2.0 redesign.  4. Does not
> impact the Log4j 1.3 release or compatibility and is very small. ]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org