You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/04/16 16:43:08 UTC
[VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
and have the same final element as the artifact name.
I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
The following specs are being voted on
geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
Source location:
geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Rick,
>> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example:
>>
>> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
>>
>> jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.
>>
>> I'm also getting an unresolved dependency during build of geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1:
>>
>> Missing:
>> ----------
>> 1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
>>
>
> This one is likely cause by not building the geronimo-osgi-locator project first. I'm able to build this one ok if I build the other first. The ejb and jaxb issues look like stop-release problems to me, unfortunately.
Ya. Would have sworn that this was after building osgi-support, but maybe not...
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Rick,
> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example:
>
> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
>
> jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.
>
> I'm also getting an unresolved dependency during build of geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1:
>
> Missing:
> ----------
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
>
This one is likely cause by not building the geronimo-osgi-locator
project first. I'm able to build this one ok if I build the other
first. The ejb and jaxb issues look like stop-release problems to me,
unfortunately.
Rick
> Unless I'm able to build from source successfully, afraid I'm going to be -1 on these releases. Can you or somebody else double check my results?
>
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> Source location:
>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try) - CANCELLED
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
These problems are serious enough to require a retry on this. I'll
start the rollback process and get new candidates ready as soon as I can.
Rick
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Rick,
> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example:
>
> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
>
> jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.
>
> I'm also getting an unresolved dependency during build of geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1:
>
> Missing:
> ----------
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
>
> Unless I'm able to build from source successfully, afraid I'm going to be -1 on these releases. Can you or somebody else double check my results?
>
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> Source location:
>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.
I'm also getting an unresolved dependency during build of geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1:
Missing:
----------
1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
Unless I'm able to build from source successfully, afraid I'm going to be -1 on these releases. Can you or somebody else double check my results?
--kevan
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
My +1
On 4/16/2010 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs
> have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
> have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
> been verified via TCK yet)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good.
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here....
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
>> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
>> 2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> 2.0_spec-1.2
>> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
>> you created the 1.0.1 tag -
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
>> line
>> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
>>
> Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that.
>
>
>> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
>> next version?
>>
> This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
> interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to
> roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope
> this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
> from the previous vote.
>
> Rick
>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>>> single vote
>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>>> been updated
>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>> have been run against
>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>
>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>
>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>> server rejected my
>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>
>>> The following specs are being voted on
>>>
>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>
>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> Source location:
>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>
>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Another tag to cleanup -
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here....
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
>> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
>> 2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> 2.0_spec-1.2
>> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
>> you created the 1.0.1 tag -
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
>> line
>> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
>>
> Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that.
>
>
>> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
>> next version?
>>
> This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
> interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to
> roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope
> this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
> from the previous vote.
>
> Rick
>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>>> single vote
>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>>> been updated
>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>> have been run against
>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>
>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>
>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>> server rejected my
>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>
>>> The following specs are being voted on
>>>
>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>
>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> Source location:
>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>
>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> A little confused here....
>
> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>
> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
> 2.0_spec-1.0.1
> 2.0_spec-1.2
> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
> you created the 1.0.1 tag -
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
> line
> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
>
Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that.
> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
> next version?
>
This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to
roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope
this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
from the previous vote.
Rick
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>> single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>> been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>> have been run against
>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>> server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> Source location:
>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
A little confused here....
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
2.0_spec-1.0.1
2.0_spec-1.2
But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
you created the 1.0.1 tag -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
line
[maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
next version?
-Donald
On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
> been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
> have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
> been verified via TCK yet)
>
>
>