You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by Chris Price <cp...@its.to> on 2006/08/23 06:24:51 UTC
[users@httpd] mod_deflate questions
Hey all;
I have some questions about mod_deflate;
Specifically, in my 8 years of using apache, I had never heard of it
until a few weeks ago. Google shows plenty of howto implement and man
page sites, but few 'mod_deflate is soo good it saved my marriage' type
of testimonials. Given the significant savings in bandwidth that *seem*
to go with mod_deflate I am wondering why I have never heard of it - it
seems too good to be true.
Would someone please be so kind as to post a broef summary of strengths
and weaknesses of mod_deflate? Browser incompatibility, issues with
nat/proxies, etc... My spidey sense is telling me that something isnt
quite right here...
Cheers and TIA,
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] mod_deflate questions
Posted by Chris Price <cp...@its.to>.
Once again my many thanks to Joshua for providing concise and extremely
informative responses on this list.
Joshua; Its people like you that make open-source communities *work*.
Cheers from Calgary,
Chris Price
> Plenty of people use mod_deflate (and the older mod_gzip), so there
> isn't any big catch. It does indeed significantly reduce bandwidth
> usage and sometimes latency.
>
> There are some disadvantages:
> - Browser incompatibilities. The mod_deflate docs give instructions
> on how to work-around the most common ones.
>
> - Increased processor usage. But many webservers are not processor
> constrained.
>
> - Pages become less cacheable since you need to vary on at least
> accept-encoding, and frequently user-agent as well.
>
> - You can't use zero-copy techniques (liek the sendfile syscall ) to
> send files, which increases the load on the server.
>
> - For many sites, the majority of content is already-compressed stuff
> like images, which won't be helped by mod_deflate.
>
> Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] mod_deflate questions
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On 8/23/06, Chris Price <cp...@its.to> wrote:
>
>
> Hey all;
>
> I have some questions about mod_deflate;
>
> Specifically, in my 8 years of using apache, I had never heard of it
> until a few weeks ago. Google shows plenty of howto implement and man
> page sites, but few 'mod_deflate is soo good it saved my marriage' type
> of testimonials. Given the significant savings in bandwidth that *seem*
> to go with mod_deflate I am wondering why I have never heard of it - it
> seems too good to be true.
>
> Would someone please be so kind as to post a broef summary of strengths
> and weaknesses of mod_deflate? Browser incompatibility, issues with
> nat/proxies, etc... My spidey sense is telling me that something isnt
> quite right here...
Plenty of people use mod_deflate (and the older mod_gzip), so there
isn't any big catch. It does indeed significantly reduce bandwidth
usage and sometimes latency.
There are some disadvantages:
- Browser incompatibilities. The mod_deflate docs give instructions
on how to work-around the most common ones.
- Increased processor usage. But many webservers are not processor constrained.
- Pages become less cacheable since you need to vary on at least
accept-encoding, and frequently user-agent as well.
- You can't use zero-copy techniques (liek the sendfile syscall ) to
send files, which increases the load on the server.
- For many sites, the majority of content is already-compressed stuff
like images, which won't be helped by mod_deflate.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org