You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/07/22 08:43:24 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] DavidLiu001 commented on a diff in pull request #20338: [FLINK-27536][Connectors / Common] Rename method parameter in AsyncSi…

DavidLiu001 commented on code in PR #20338:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/20338#discussion_r927431507


##########
flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java:
##########
@@ -170,30 +170,30 @@
      * the valid limits of the destination). The logic then needs to create and execute the request
      * asynchronously against the destination (ideally by batching together multiple request entries
      * to increase efficiency). The logic also needs to identify individual request entries that
-     * were not persisted successfully and resubmit them using the {@code requestResult} callback.
+     * were not persisted successfully and resubmit them using the {@code requestToRetry} callback.

Review Comment:
   For example, it is used to call the method of accept() ->  requestToRetry.accept(retryableFailedRecords)
   @dannycranmer  If you still think requestsToRetry is better, I will change to  requestsToRetry



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org