You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> on 2009/11/29 19:19:59 UTC
[IMAP] JPA vs Torque
Hi all (Robert ;) ),
when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque implentation
and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ? How much more work
need the other ?
Thx,
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [IMAP] JPA vs Torque
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 29.11.2009 um 21:29 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com
>:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Norman Maurer
> <no...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>> Am 29.11.2009 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <ro...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all (Robert ;) ),
>>>>
>>>> when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque
>>>> implentation
>>>> and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ?
>>>
>>> torque works (i've been running it for the last couple of years) but
>>> has quite a number of technical limitations
>>>
>>> openjpa probably works and uses an architecture more suitable for
>>> other implementations eg jackrabbit and should be quicker
>>>
>>>> How much more work need the other ?
>>>
>>> torque configuration is a complete hack but openjpa etc pretty much
>>> requires an injection container
>>>
>>> - robert
>>>
>>
>> So guice should help , right?
>
> if wanted to give OpenJPA a try then you could use Guice to do that
>
> - robert
>
Ok i should have Complete the avalon to guice migration of James
Server in the next two weeks. I will have à look then
Bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [IMAP] JPA vs Torque
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Norman Maurer
<no...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Am 29.11.2009 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin
> <ro...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all (Robert ;) ),
>>>
>>> when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque implentation
>>> and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ?
>>
>> torque works (i've been running it for the last couple of years) but
>> has quite a number of technical limitations
>>
>> openjpa probably works and uses an architecture more suitable for
>> other implementations eg jackrabbit and should be quicker
>>
>>> How much more work need the other ?
>>
>> torque configuration is a complete hack but openjpa etc pretty much
>> requires an injection container
>>
>> - robert
>>
>
> So guice should help , right?
if wanted to give OpenJPA a try then you could use Guice to do that
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [IMAP] JPA vs Torque
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 29.11.2009 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com
>:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>> Hi all (Robert ;) ),
>>
>> when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque implentation
>> and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ?
>
> torque works (i've been running it for the last couple of years) but
> has quite a number of technical limitations
>
> openjpa probably works and uses an architecture more suitable for
> other implementations eg jackrabbit and should be quicker
>
>> How much more work need the other ?
>
> torque configuration is a complete hack but openjpa etc pretty much
> requires an injection container
>
> - robert
>
So guice should help , right?
Bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [IMAP] JPA vs Torque
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all (Robert ;) ),
>
> when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque implentation
> and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ?
torque works (i've been running it for the last couple of years) but
has quite a number of technical limitations
openjpa probably works and uses an architecture more suitable for
other implementations eg jackrabbit and should be quicker
> How much more work need the other ?
torque configuration is a complete hack but openjpa etc pretty much
requires an injection container
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org