You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/22 15:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7109) rep:facet returns wrong results for
complex queries
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16372914#comment-16372914 ]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7109:
-------------------------------------
[~diru] OK I (think) I understand.
> Not sure if the index supports not()
For "contains", this is supported via "contains(..., '-exclude')". But for generic conditions, no it's not currently supported.
> rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7109
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
> Affects Versions: 1.6.7
> Reporter: Dirk Rudolph
> Priority: Major
> Labels: facet
> Attachments: facetsInMultipleRoots.patch, restrictionPropagationTest.patch
>
>
> eComplex queries in that case are queries, which are passed to lucene not containing all original constraints. For example queries with multiple path restrictions like:
> {code}
> select [rep:facet(simple/tags)] from [nt:base] as a where contains(a.[*], 'ipsum') and (isdescendantnode(a,'/content1') or isdescendantnode(a,'/content2'))
> {code}
> In that particular case the index planer gives ":fulltext:ipsum" to lucene even though the index supports evaluating path constraints.
> As counting the facets happens on the raw result of lucene, the returned facets are incorrect. For example having the following content
> {code}
> /content1/test/foo
> + text = lorem ipsum
> - simple/
> + tags = tag1, tag2
> /content2/test/bar
> + text = lorem ipsum
> - simple/
> + tags = tag1, tag2
> /content3/test/bar
> + text = lorem ipsum
> - simple/
> + tags = tag1, tag2
> {code}
> the expected result for the dimensions of simple/tags and the query above is
> - tag1: 2
> - tag2: 2
> as the result set is 2 results long and all documents are equal. The actual result set is
> - tag1: 3
> - tag2: 3
> as the path constraint is not handled by lucene.
> To workaround that the only solution that came to my mind is building the [disjunctive normal form|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_normal_form] of my complex query and executing a query for each of the disjunctive statements. As this is expanding exponentially its only a theoretical solution, nothing for production.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)