You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@shardingsphere.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/07/30 13:32:07 UTC
[GitHub] [shardingsphere] wcsoft commented on issue #6536: [Performance Test] Provide a full-scale and multi-scenario benchmark test
wcsoft commented on issue #6536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/issues/6536#issuecomment-666366565
Recently i have been investigating ShardingProxy and ShardingJDBC performance.
Senarios i did
- Base Data 1000w vs Base Data 1000, observe tps of ShardingDBC & ShardingProxy;
- With base data 1000w, comparing ShardingJDBC&ShardingProxy to Mysql, observe tps of ShardingDBC & ShardingProxy and Mysql;
Result i got
- At senario 1 - base data 1000w vs base data 1000, ShardingDBC & ShardingProxy tps improves a lot with base data 1000w, refer to image 1 as detail data ;
- At senario 2 - with base data 1000w, comparing ShardingJDBC&ShardingProxy to Mysql, their tps is much better for full routing select/full routing insert+update+delete/masterslave+encrpytinsert+update+delete than mysql. In addition their tps is lower than Mysql, refer to image 2 as detail data ;
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org