You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by John Thomas <jo...@live.com> on 2020/08/02 18:04:46 UTC

Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Hello ,

The vote has been open for >72 hours, yet to get some binding votes.  Can everyone please take a look at this KIP and vote ?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries

Current stats :

  *   binding+1 (John Roesler)
  *   non-binding+1 (Navinder Brar, Jorge Esteban, Bruno Cadonna) and no -1 votes.

Regards,
John

________________________________
From: Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io>
Sent: 29 July 2020 10:36
To: dev@kafka.apache.org <de...@kafka.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Thanks John,

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Bruno

On 29.07.20 01:02, John Thomas wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'd like to kick-off a vote for KIP-648 : Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
>
> It's a straight forward change to include new getters and deprecate the existing ones for the class KeyQueryMetadata.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Posted by John Thomas <jo...@live.com>.
Thank you for your votes everyone!

The KIP has been accepted with 3 binding votes, 3 non-binding votes and no -1 votes.

  *   3 binding +1 : Matthias J. Sax, Boyang Chen, John Roesler
  *   non-binding+1 (Navinder Brar, Jorge Esteban, Bruno Cadonna)

- John
________________________________
From: Boyang Chen <re...@gmail.com>
Sent: 03 August 2020 17:46
To: dev <de...@kafka.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) from me!

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:49 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP, John!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On 8/2/20 11:04 AM, John Thomas wrote:
> > Hello ,
> >
> > The vote has been open for >72 hours, yet to get some binding votes.
> Can everyone please take a look at this KIP and vote ?
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
> >
> > Current stats :
> >
> >   *   binding+1 (John Roesler)
> >   *   non-binding+1 (Navinder Brar, Jorge Esteban, Bruno Cadonna) and no
> -1 votes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io>
> > Sent: 29 July 2020 10:36
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive
> Queries
> >
> > Thanks John,
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Bruno
> >
> > On 29.07.20 01:02, John Thomas wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I'd like to kick-off a vote for KIP-648 : Renaming getter method for
> Interactive Queries
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
> >>
> >> It's a straight forward change to include new getters and deprecate the
> existing ones for the class KeyQueryMetadata.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Posted by Boyang Chen <re...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) from me!

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:49 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP, John!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On 8/2/20 11:04 AM, John Thomas wrote:
> > Hello ,
> >
> > The vote has been open for >72 hours, yet to get some binding votes.
> Can everyone please take a look at this KIP and vote ?
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
> >
> > Current stats :
> >
> >   *   binding+1 (John Roesler)
> >   *   non-binding+1 (Navinder Brar, Jorge Esteban, Bruno Cadonna) and no
> -1 votes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io>
> > Sent: 29 July 2020 10:36
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive
> Queries
> >
> > Thanks John,
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Bruno
> >
> > On 29.07.20 01:02, John Thomas wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I'd like to kick-off a vote for KIP-648 : Renaming getter method for
> Interactive Queries
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
> >>
> >> It's a straight forward change to include new getters and deprecate the
> existing ones for the class KeyQueryMetadata.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries

Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the KIP, John!

+1 (binding)



On 8/2/20 11:04 AM, John Thomas wrote:
> Hello ,
> 
> The vote has been open for >72 hours, yet to get some binding votes.  Can everyone please take a look at this KIP and vote ?
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
> 
> Current stats :
> 
>   *   binding+1 (John Roesler)
>   *   non-binding+1 (Navinder Brar, Jorge Esteban, Bruno Cadonna) and no -1 votes.
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io>
> Sent: 29 July 2020 10:36
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org <de...@kafka.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-648: Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries
> 
> Thanks John,
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Best,
> Bruno
> 
> On 29.07.20 01:02, John Thomas wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to kick-off a vote for KIP-648 : Renaming getter method for Interactive Queries
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-648%3A+Renaming+getter+method+for+Interactive+Queries
>>
>> It's a straight forward change to include new getters and deprecate the existing ones for the class KeyQueryMetadata.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>>
>