You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Aki Yoshida (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/07/12 10:11:48 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CXF-5095) Allow adding attachments to the contetx using jaxws attachments

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Aki Yoshida resolved CXF-5095.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.7.6
                   2.6.9
    
> Allow adding attachments to the contetx using jaxws attachments
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5095
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.5
>            Reporter: Aki Yoshida
>            Assignee: Aki Yoshida
>             Fix For: 2.6.9, 2.7.6
>
>
> Currently, it is not possible to add attachments using jaxws's attachments.
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Attachments-for-Dispatch-not-supported-td5729017.html
> There are some options to get the wiring of attachments (of cxf and jaxws) working.
> Option 1
> change the WrappedMessageContext's put method so that the cxf's native attachments-set gets added when the jaxws attachments-map is added.
> This is probably the simplest approach. But its limitation is that you cannot reflect any change of the original jaxws attachments-map into the actual cxf's attachments-set stored in the context, once this cxf's attachments-set is created and inserted.
> Option 2
> introduce package local WrappedAttachments that holds the original jaxws's attachments-map and expose it as the cxf's attachments-set. That means, when the jaxws's attachments-map is inserted, WrappedMessageContext can wrap it with WrappedAttachments which is treated as cxf's attachments-set. In this way, any operations on cxf's attachments-set or jaxws' attachments-map remain consistent. 
> Option 2 is more flexible than option 1 and prevents potential confusion. So, I think we can choose option 2.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira