You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "Marko A. Rodriguez (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/13 18:18:20 UTC

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1506:
---------------------------------------------

             Summary: Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.
                 Key: TINKERPOP-1506
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506
             Project: TinkerPop
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: process
    Affects Versions: 3.2.2, 3.1.4
            Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez


It took me a long time to realize what was wrong with a traversal I wrote that used {{optional(blah.sideEffect.blah)}}. {{optional()}} maps to {{ChooseStep}} under the hood and the provide traversal is first tested for a {{hasNext()}}. If so, the it plays itself out. The problem is that if there is a side-effect in the traversal child, then it gets executed twice. 

{code}
gremlin> g = TinkerGraph.open().traversal()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:0 edges:0], standard]
gremlin> g.inject(1).optional(addV('twin'))
==>v[1]
gremlin> g.V().valueMap(true)
==>[id:0,label:twin]
==>[id:1,label:twin]
{code}

We should NOT allow {{optional()}} to have {{SideEffectStep}} steps in it so as not to cause unexpected behavior. {{StandardVerificationStrategy}} can analyze and throw an exception if necessary.

Also, {{coalesce()}} has a similar problem, though perhaps it can be a useful 'technique.'

{code}
gremlin> g = TinkerGraph.open().traversal()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:0 edges:0], standard]
gremlin> g.inject(1).coalesce(addV('twin1').limit(0), addV('twin2'))
==>v[1]
gremlin> g.V().valueMap(true)
==>[id:0,label:twin1]
==>[id:1,label:twin2]
gremlin>
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)