You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/23 23:42:31 UTC
DataHandlers
I wonder if any of you CXF Users out there know more about common
expectations about Data Handlers than I do.
In Aegis, currently, if you put use DataHandler for a property type,
what you get at runtime depends on whether MTOM actually is on. If
it's off, the Object in the DH will be a byte[], and the stream will
be null.
If it's on, the Object will be null, and the stream will be there.
I have opened a JIRA stating an intention to make it always provide
the stream and never the byte[], but, before I do it, I thought to see
if anyone out there has opinions.
Re: DataHandlers
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
Sounds good to me. A byte[] is always bad for mass data as you can´t
stream it then. And I guess normally when you use a datahandler it means
you want to handle mass data.
Regards
Christian
Am 23.10.2010 23:42, schrieb Benson Margulies:
> I wonder if any of you CXF Users out there know more about common
> expectations about Data Handlers than I do.
>
> In Aegis, currently, if you put use DataHandler for a property type,
> what you get at runtime depends on whether MTOM actually is on. If
> it's off, the Object in the DH will be a byte[], and the stream will
> be null.
>
> If it's on, the Object will be null, and the stream will be there.
>
> I have opened a JIRA stating an intention to make it always provide
> the stream and never the byte[], but, before I do it, I thought to see
> if anyone out there has opinions.
>
--
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Re: DataHandlers
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Saturday 23 October 2010 5:42:31 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> I wonder if any of you CXF Users out there know more about common
> expectations about Data Handlers than I do.
>
> In Aegis, currently, if you put use DataHandler for a property type,
> what you get at runtime depends on whether MTOM actually is on. If
> it's off, the Object in the DH will be a byte[], and the stream will
> be null.
>
> If it's on, the Object will be null, and the stream will be there.
>
> I have opened a JIRA stating an intention to make it always provide
> the stream and never the byte[], but, before I do it, I thought to see
> if anyone out there has opinions.
I think making it consistent is super important, and using Streams makes the
most sense.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog