You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nifi.apache.org by Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> on 2015/08/26 16:08:09 UTC

0.3.0 In-depth Testing

Folks,

I will be acting as the Release Manager for the upcoming 0.3.0 release.  I
am pleased to announce the tickets that were originally assigned with a fix
version of 0.3.0 have been completed and many great features and
improvements have been incorporated.

Over the past couple of days, some have been doing some in-depth and
rigorous testing to find and iron out any quirks in using NiFi.  This has,
so far, generated two issues to be addressed.

Anyone that has a few spare moments and would like to join in, please feel
free to do so and identify any unexpected behavior that may arise under
different scenarios in which you use NiFi or even exceptional cases.

Points of emphasis have been handling system conditions that may arise due
to issues concerning disk space and the underlying repositories.

Thanks!

--Aldrin

Re: 0.3.0 In-depth Testing

Posted by Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com>.
Seems fine to me and thank for finding that.  People definitely want
to be able to use the Flume processors and this seems easy to address
and help them keep moving forward.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bryan,
>
> Seems like this is certainly narrow enough in scope that its inclusion
> would not be anything onerous and would agree that it's a nice fix to
> include.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Bryan Bende <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I was testing a scenario this morning using the Flume processors to
>> leverage
>> Flume's Syslog sources, and ran into an issue that I created a ticket for
>> [1].
>>
>> Assuming the patch is reviewed and agreed upon, I would suggest this could
>> be included in 0.3.0 as it only affects a single line of code in
>> ExecuteFlumeSource.
>> If there is any objection to this let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bryan
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-895
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > I will be acting as the Release Manager for the upcoming 0.3.0 release.
>> I
>> > am pleased to announce the tickets that were originally assigned with a
>> fix
>> > version of 0.3.0 have been completed and many great features and
>> > improvements have been incorporated.
>> >
>> > Over the past couple of days, some have been doing some in-depth and
>> > rigorous testing to find and iron out any quirks in using NiFi.  This
>> has,
>> > so far, generated two issues to be addressed.
>> >
>> > Anyone that has a few spare moments and would like to join in, please
>> feel
>> > free to do so and identify any unexpected behavior that may arise under
>> > different scenarios in which you use NiFi or even exceptional cases.
>> >
>> > Points of emphasis have been handling system conditions that may arise
>> due
>> > to issues concerning disk space and the underlying repositories.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > --Aldrin
>> >
>>

Re: 0.3.0 In-depth Testing

Posted by Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com>.
Bryan,

Seems like this is certainly narrow enough in scope that its inclusion
would not be anything onerous and would agree that it's a nice fix to
include.


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Bryan Bende <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I was testing a scenario this morning using the Flume processors to
> leverage
> Flume's Syslog sources, and ran into an issue that I created a ticket for
> [1].
>
> Assuming the patch is reviewed and agreed upon, I would suggest this could
> be included in 0.3.0 as it only affects a single line of code in
> ExecuteFlumeSource.
> If there is any objection to this let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-895
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I will be acting as the Release Manager for the upcoming 0.3.0 release.
> I
> > am pleased to announce the tickets that were originally assigned with a
> fix
> > version of 0.3.0 have been completed and many great features and
> > improvements have been incorporated.
> >
> > Over the past couple of days, some have been doing some in-depth and
> > rigorous testing to find and iron out any quirks in using NiFi.  This
> has,
> > so far, generated two issues to be addressed.
> >
> > Anyone that has a few spare moments and would like to join in, please
> feel
> > free to do so and identify any unexpected behavior that may arise under
> > different scenarios in which you use NiFi or even exceptional cases.
> >
> > Points of emphasis have been handling system conditions that may arise
> due
> > to issues concerning disk space and the underlying repositories.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --Aldrin
> >
>

Re: 0.3.0 In-depth Testing

Posted by Bryan Bende <bb...@gmail.com>.
All,

I was testing a scenario this morning using the Flume processors to
leverage
Flume's Syslog sources, and ran into an issue that I created a ticket for
[1].

Assuming the patch is reviewed and agreed upon, I would suggest this could
be included in 0.3.0 as it only affects a single line of code in
ExecuteFlumeSource.
If there is any objection to this let me know.

Thanks,

Bryan

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-895

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I will be acting as the Release Manager for the upcoming 0.3.0 release.  I
> am pleased to announce the tickets that were originally assigned with a fix
> version of 0.3.0 have been completed and many great features and
> improvements have been incorporated.
>
> Over the past couple of days, some have been doing some in-depth and
> rigorous testing to find and iron out any quirks in using NiFi.  This has,
> so far, generated two issues to be addressed.
>
> Anyone that has a few spare moments and would like to join in, please feel
> free to do so and identify any unexpected behavior that may arise under
> different scenarios in which you use NiFi or even exceptional cases.
>
> Points of emphasis have been handling system conditions that may arise due
> to issues concerning disk space and the underlying repositories.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Aldrin
>