You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@buildr.apache.org by Kristof Jozsa <kr...@gmail.com> on 2010/07/01 15:46:30 UTC
buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Hi guys,
I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
issue.. but sure you know better than me.
The issue is shown here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
thanks a lot,
K
Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Posted by Kristof Jozsa <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi alex,
I've installed ruby 1.9.2-preview3 the other day and buildr is working
perfectly with it. Based on this fact I don't think the Buildr team
should do any serious efforts getting rid of this problem, I think
it'll just resolve itself once ruby 1.9.2 is released as final..
K
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kristof,
>
> Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for reporting.
> If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivial
> fix) it would be appreciated.
>
> alex
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
>> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
>> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
>> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
>>
>> The issue is shown here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
>> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
>> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
>>
>> thanks a lot,
>> K
>>
>
Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
JRuby 1.6 targets supporting 1.9. When they do we can think of moving on.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:38, Rhett Sutphin <rh...@detailedbalance.net>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> > Hi Kristof,
> >
> > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for
> reporting.
> > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a
> trivial
> > fix) it would be appreciated.
>
> I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious
> problem: it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is
> activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's
> case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests.
>
> Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related. I don't
> think this can be fixed in buildr.
>
> Rhett
>
> [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140
>
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jozsa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
> >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
> >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
> >> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
> >>
> >> The issue is shown here:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
> >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
> >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
> >>
> >> thanks a lot,
> >> K
> >>
>
>
Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Posted by Rhett Sutphin <rh...@detailedbalance.net>.
Hi,
On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Hi Kristof,
>
> Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for reporting.
> If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivial
> fix) it would be appreciated.
I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious problem: it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests.
Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related. I don't think this can be fixed in buildr.
Rhett
[1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140
>
> alex
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
>> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
>> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
>> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
>>
>> The issue is shown here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
>> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
>> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
>>
>> thanks a lot,
>> K
>>
Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kristof,
Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for reporting.
If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivial
fix) it would be appreciated.
alex
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
>
> The issue is shown here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
>
> thanks a lot,
> K
>