You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by Nikhil P <np...@gmail.com> on 2018/06/15 12:37:08 UTC
Review Request 67599: Ranger UserSync port (ie 5151) supports TLSv1.0
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
Bugs: RANGER-2131
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2131
Repository: ranger
Description
-------
make SSL/TLS protocols for usersync configurable by user
Diffs
-----
unixauthservice/conf.dist/ranger-ugsync-default.xml c02be51
unixauthservice/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/authentication/UnixAuthenticationService.java 6ed2174
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/diff/1/
Testing
-------
1.Tested if configured protocols works properly.
2.Tested if no property specified , default protocols should be supported.
Thanks,
Nikhil P
Re: Review Request 67599: Ranger UserSync port (ie 5151) supports
TLSv1.0
Posted by Velmurugan Periasamy <vp...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/#review204841
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Velmurugan Periasamy
On June 15, 2018, 12:37 p.m., Nikhil P wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 15, 2018, 12:37 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
>
>
> Bugs: RANGER-2131
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2131
>
>
> Repository: ranger
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> make SSL/TLS protocols for usersync configurable by user
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> unixauthservice/conf.dist/ranger-ugsync-default.xml c02be51
> unixauthservice/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/authentication/UnixAuthenticationService.java 6ed2174
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 1.Tested if configured protocols works properly.
> 2.Tested if no property specified , default protocols should be supported.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikhil P
>
>
Re: Review Request 67599: Ranger UserSync port (ie 5151) supports
TLSv1.0
Posted by Mehul Parikh <me...@freestoneinfotech.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/#review204894
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mehul Parikh
On June 15, 2018, 12:37 p.m., Nikhil P wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 15, 2018, 12:37 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
>
>
> Bugs: RANGER-2131
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2131
>
>
> Repository: ranger
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> make SSL/TLS protocols for usersync configurable by user
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> unixauthservice/conf.dist/ranger-ugsync-default.xml c02be51
> unixauthservice/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/authentication/UnixAuthenticationService.java 6ed2174
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67599/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 1.Tested if configured protocols works properly.
> 2.Tested if no property specified , default protocols should be supported.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikhil P
>
>