You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com> on 2022/01/10 22:41:11 UTC

[DRAFT] 2022-01 board report

Hi,

as usual, please see below draft for this quarter's board report. Any
edits, comments, etc. are more than welcome.

The report is due to next Wednesday, so apologies on sending the draft
this late, I'll try to have it prepared with more time for next
report.


cheers,
juan pablo

+++ b/board-reports/2022-01.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## Description:
+The mission of JSPWiki is the creation and maintenance of software related to
+Leading open source WikiWiki engine, feature-rich and built around standard
+JEE components (Java, servlets, JSP).
+
+## Issues:
+There are no issues requiring board attention.
+
+## Membership Data:
+Apache JSPWiki was founded 2013-07-17 (8 years ago)
+There are currently 14 committers and 8 PMC members in this project.
+The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 7:4.
+
+Community changes, past quarter:
+- No new PMC members. Last addition was Dave Koelmeyer on 2016-04-06.
+- No new committers. Last addition was Dave Koelmeyer on 2016-04-06.
+
+## Project Activity:
+After almost a year since last release, this quarter we managed to finally
+release 2.11.0. A few days after that, we had to release 2.11.1, to address
+recent log4j2 rce vulnerability.
+
+Aside from the releases, dev activity has been focused on providing support
+for markdown inside JSPWiki. Currently we have a parser and a renderer, and
+we need to add support for both plain and WYSIWYG editors. For the latter,
+there's a refactor ongoing, which should be completed soon.
+
+2 vulnerability disclosures were published and fixed in 2.11.0, we have a
+couple more which need investigation.
+
+Finally there was a discuss thread on moving from jira to github issues,
+but got nowhere, so we'll stick with jira for now.
+
+## Community Health:
+Traffic on both MLs had an increase compared with last quarter, due to both
+releases and the increased number of commits that were pushed this quarter.
+There is enough people to provide project oversight.
+

Re: [DRAFT] 2022-01 board report

Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
Juan,

+1 ;  tx for the preparation !

dirk

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:41 PM Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as usual, please see below draft for this quarter's board report. Any
> edits, comments, etc. are more than welcome.
>
> The report is due to next Wednesday, so apologies on sending the draft
> this late, I'll try to have it prepared with more time for next
> report.
>
>
> cheers,
> juan pablo
>
> +++ b/board-reports/2022-01.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +## Description:
> +The mission of JSPWiki is the creation and maintenance of software
> related to
> +Leading open source WikiWiki engine, feature-rich and built around
> standard
> +JEE components (Java, servlets, JSP).
> +
> +## Issues:
> +There are no issues requiring board attention.
> +
> +## Membership Data:
> +Apache JSPWiki was founded 2013-07-17 (8 years ago)
> +There are currently 14 committers and 8 PMC members in this project.
> +The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 7:4.
> +
> +Community changes, past quarter:
> +- No new PMC members. Last addition was Dave Koelmeyer on 2016-04-06.
> +- No new committers. Last addition was Dave Koelmeyer on 2016-04-06.
> +
> +## Project Activity:
> +After almost a year since last release, this quarter we managed to finally
> +release 2.11.0. A few days after that, we had to release 2.11.1, to
> address
> +recent log4j2 rce vulnerability.
> +
> +Aside from the releases, dev activity has been focused on providing
> support
> +for markdown inside JSPWiki. Currently we have a parser and a renderer,
> and
> +we need to add support for both plain and WYSIWYG editors. For the latter,
> +there's a refactor ongoing, which should be completed soon.
> +
> +2 vulnerability disclosures were published and fixed in 2.11.0, we have a
> +couple more which need investigation.
> +
> +Finally there was a discuss thread on moving from jira to github issues,
> +but got nowhere, so we'll stick with jira for now.
> +
> +## Community Health:
> +Traffic on both MLs had an increase compared with last quarter, due to
> both
> +releases and the increased number of commits that were pushed this
> quarter.
> +There is enough people to provide project oversight.
> +
>