You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@buildr.apache.org by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> on 2010/07/08 03:34:41 UTC
Back to the grind for 1.4.2
I have listed the issues I'd like to see fixed for 1.4.2 here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR/fixforversion/12315179
I can't commit to a date for a release but I'd like it to happen in a month
from now.
Now is the time to send patches!
Antoine
Re: Back to the grind for 1.4.2
Posted by Shane Witbeck <sh...@digitalsanctum.com>.
Done. I created a patch that removes the Nailgun section from the website.
The new home on the wiki is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BUILDR/How+to+run+buildr+using+nailgun
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I suggest we move it to the wiki as second-tier documentation, with
> some mention of about marginal effectiveness.
>
> alex
>
> On Thursday, July 8, 2010, Shane Witbeck <sh...@digitalsanctum.com> wrote:
> > I commented on the issue I reported about the Nailgun doc not being
> > accurate/up to date. I'm wondering if we should remove the reference
> > altogether since the performance benefits for using it seems to be
> shrinking
> > due to the faster startup times of the latest JRuby releases.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-302
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I have listed the issues I'd like to see fixed for 1.4.2 here:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR/fixforversion/12315179
> >>
> >> I can't commit to a date for a release but I'd like it to happen in a
> month
> >> from now.
> >>
> >> Now is the time to send patches!
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Shane
> >
>
--
-Shane
Re: Back to the grind for 1.4.2
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
I suggest we move it to the wiki as second-tier documentation, with
some mention of about marginal effectiveness.
alex
On Thursday, July 8, 2010, Shane Witbeck <sh...@digitalsanctum.com> wrote:
> I commented on the issue I reported about the Nailgun doc not being
> accurate/up to date. I'm wondering if we should remove the reference
> altogether since the performance benefits for using it seems to be shrinking
> due to the faster startup times of the latest JRuby releases.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-302
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
>
>> I have listed the issues I'd like to see fixed for 1.4.2 here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR/fixforversion/12315179
>>
>> I can't commit to a date for a release but I'd like it to happen in a month
>> from now.
>>
>> Now is the time to send patches!
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shane
>
Re: Back to the grind for 1.4.2
Posted by Shane Witbeck <sh...@digitalsanctum.com>.
I commented on the issue I reported about the Nailgun doc not being
accurate/up to date. I'm wondering if we should remove the reference
altogether since the performance benefits for using it seems to be shrinking
due to the faster startup times of the latest JRuby releases.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-302
Thoughts?
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> I have listed the issues I'd like to see fixed for 1.4.2 here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR/fixforversion/12315179
>
> I can't commit to a date for a release but I'd like it to happen in a month
> from now.
>
> Now is the time to send patches!
>
> Antoine
>
--
-Shane