You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Robert Menschel <Ro...@Menschel.net> on 2005/02/03 03:22:13 UTC

Re: New rules

Hello Matthew,

Tuesday, December 7, 2004, 7:32:22 AM, you wrote:

MN> Hello,

MN> I've recently installed SA 3.0.1, and found some junk was
MN> getting through with scores too low for my liking, especially before the
MN> URLs made it into SURBL. I've put together a few rules to match some
MN> of these that you might find interesting.

My mass-check results on your rules:

Section 3 -- Frequencies Log
(First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)

OVERALL    SPAM      HAM      S/O    RANK  SCORE  NAME
  95120    59679    35441    0.627   0.00   0.00  (all messages)
   2231     2231        0    1.000   1.00   0.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB1
   3331     3330        1    0.999   0.90   0.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY1
    470      470        0    1.000   0.86   2.00  UOLCC_WATCH_BODY
     19       19        0    1.000   0.45   1.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY2
      0        0        0    0.500   0.31   3.50  UOLCC_HTM_HTML_URL
      0        0        0    0.500   0.31   1.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB2
     66       37       29    0.431   0.10   0.10  UOLCC_CAPWORD_TEST
    136       51       85    0.263   0.00   2.00  UOLCC_BBONE

OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
  95120    59679    35441    0.627   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
100.000  62.7407  37.2593    0.627   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
  2.345   3.7383   0.0000    1.000   1.00    0.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB1
  3.502   5.5799   0.0028    0.999   0.90    0.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY1
  0.494   0.7875   0.0000    1.000   0.86    2.00  UOLCC_WATCH_BODY
  0.020   0.0318   0.0000    1.000   0.45    1.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY2
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.31    3.50  UOLCC_HTM_HTML_URL
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.31    1.50  UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB2
  0.069   0.0620   0.0818    0.431   0.10    0.10  UOLCC_CAPWORD_TEST
  0.143   0.0855   0.2398    0.263   0.00    2.00  UOLCC_BBONE

The single words Rolex in subject and/or body are the best hitters,
but then nobody in my domains discusses buying Rolex watches as
birthday or anniversary presents.

Bob Menschel