You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by Gert Villemos <gv...@yahoo.de> on 2011/04/07 20:09:23 UTC
Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel
(5.2.0) libraries
What is the difference between the
* Camel-Activemq (1.1.0)
* Activemq-Camel (5.2.0)
Libraries?
Is the 'Camel-Activemq' library simply an old deprecated version no longer
used? And should I always use 'Activemq-Camel'? Or is there a subtle
difference?
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-camel-activemq-1-1-0-and-activemq-camel-5-2-0-libraries-tp4289122p4289122.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel (5.2.0) libraries
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Yes, there is a subtle difference:
1. http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-package-applications-using-camel-and-activemq.html
"[...] you may wish to use Camel's Enterprise Integration Patterns *inside* the ActiveMQ Broker [...]"
2. http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html
http://camel.apache.org/jms.html
"The [Camel] ActiveMQ component allows messages to be sent to a JMS Queue or Topic or messages to be consumed from a JMS Queue or Topic using Apache ActiveMQ" - i.e. outside the broker.
I hope that helps,
Hadrian
On Apr 7, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Gert Villemos wrote:
> What is the difference between the
>
> * Camel-Activemq (1.1.0)
> * Activemq-Camel (5.2.0)
>
> Libraries?
>
> Is the 'Camel-Activemq' library simply an old deprecated version no longer
> used? And should I always use 'Activemq-Camel'? Or is there a subtle
> difference?
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-camel-activemq-1-1-0-and-activemq-camel-5-2-0-libraries-tp4289122p4289122.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel
(5.2.0) libraries
Posted by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>.
Exactly.
Always choose ActiveMQ-Camel.
It is the component written and maintained by the ActiveMQ team themselves.
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Gert Villemos <gv...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> What is the difference between the
>
> * Camel-Activemq (1.1.0)
> * Activemq-Camel (5.2.0)
>
> Libraries?
>
> Is the 'Camel-Activemq' library simply an old deprecated version no longer
> used? And should I always use 'Activemq-Camel'? Or is there a subtle
> difference?
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-camel-activemq-1-1-0-and-activemq-camel-5-2-0-libraries-tp4289122p4289122.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>