Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>]

Some notes, no vote yet:

- The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
link is wrong.

- HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
why it's missing.

J-D

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
> here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>
> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>
> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>
> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
> developer releases?
>
> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
> definitely not for production deploys.
>
> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
> code has gone in.
>
> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

Vote passes.  Thanks to all who voted.  I'll put up the release later today.
St.Ack

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran this release on 15 nodes and used Import to pull in some data,
> the performance was great and all went well.
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
>> night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
>> assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm +1
>>>
>>> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
>>> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
>>> basically worked.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
>>> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
>>> >
>>> > J-D
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
>>> >>
>>> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>>> >> link is wrong.
>>> >>
>>> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>>> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>>> >> why it's missing.
>>> >>
>>> >> J-D
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>>> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>>> >>> here:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>>> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>>> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>>> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>>> >>> developer releases?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>>> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
>>> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>>> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>>> >>> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>>> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>>> >>> code has gone in.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> St.Ack
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>]

I ran this release on 15 nodes and used Import to pull in some data,
the performance was great and all went well.

+1

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
> night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
> assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm +1
>>
>> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
>> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
>> basically worked.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
>> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
>> >
>> > J-D
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
>> >>
>> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>> >> link is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>> >> why it's missing.
>> >>
>> >> J-D
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>> >>> here:
>> >>>
>> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>> >>>
>> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>> >>>
>> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>> >>>
>> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>> >>> developer releases?
>> >>>
>> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
>> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>> >>> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
>> >>>
>> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>> >>> code has gone in.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> St.Ack
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>]

Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
assignment at startup. Looks good. +1

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> I'm +1
>
> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
> basically worked.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
> >>
> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
> >> link is wrong.
> >>
> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
> >> why it's missing.
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
> >>> here:
> >>>
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
> >>>
> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
> >>>
> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
> >>>
> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
> >>> developer releases?
> >>>
> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
> >>> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
> >>>
> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
> >>> code has gone in.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

I'm +1

I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
basically worked.

St.Ack

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
> testing I did today leads me to +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Some notes, no vote yet:
>>
>> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>> link is wrong.
>>
>> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>> why it's missing.
>>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>>> here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>>
>>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>>
>>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>>
>>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>>> developer releases?
>>>
>>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>>> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
>>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>>> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>>
>>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>>> code has gone in.
>>>
>>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?

[Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>]

Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
testing I did today leads me to +1.

J-D

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Some notes, no vote yet:
>
> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
> link is wrong.
>
> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
> why it's missing.
>
> J-D
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>> here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>
>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>
>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>
>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>> developer releases?
>>
>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>> about the purpose of this release candidate.  Also see [1].  In
>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>> release.  We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>
>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>> code has gone in.
>>
>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>
>