You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tvm.apache.org by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 20:33:32 UTC

[apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992

-- Commit Summary --

  * [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule

-- File Changes --

    M .gitmodules (3)
    D 3rdparty/vta-hw (1)
    M CMakeLists.txt (2)
    M Jenkinsfile (128)
    M jenkins/Build.groovy.j2 (8)
    M jenkins/Jenkinsfile.j2 (6)
    M jenkins/Prepare.groovy.j2 (8)
    M jenkins/Test.groovy.j2 (8)
    M tests/scripts/git_change_docker.sh (4)
    M tests/scripts/git_change_docs.sh (2)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992.patch
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992.diff

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: &lt;apache/tvm/pull/11992@github.com&gt;

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
Merged #11992 into v0.9.0.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#event-6988495839
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by hirohaku <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
@driazati @AndrewZhaoLuo 

Hi! I came back to use VTA, but I am confused about why you removed the VTA submodule. 
Did VTA have any critical issues? or temporary development?
Could you tell us any information, please? If you have some discussion article, please provide us.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#issuecomment-1295050262
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
failures look flaky, merging anyways

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#issuecomment-1183580209
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by Sam Ho <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
Sorry may I ask why has `vta-hw` submodule been removed, and how does that affect the support status of the compiler side of `VTA` as a TVM sub-project? I don't seem to be able to find in anywhere mention of why it's removed. Are there still developer on either/both sides and would it make sense to further contribute to them? (coz at work we're trying to deploy VTA into some RISC-V platform on FPGA, before doing further improvements in the hw design). @tqchen @tmoreau89 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#issuecomment-1197064902
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by hirohaku <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
@tqchen 
Thank you for your reply!
Ah~ I got it. You align release time between tvm and vta.
So,  [v0.8.0 branch](https://github.com/apache/tvm/tree/v0.8.0) is stable release for VTA and [recent main branch](https://github.com/apache/tvm/tree/20082614be85f14a7d6f4e653f2adcd89d0a3717) is developing release for VTA isn't it?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#issuecomment-1295671415
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>

Re: [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992)

Posted by Tianqi Chen <no...@github.com.INVALID>.
Thanks @hirohaku21 

VTA is still part of the apache tvm, we are removing it from the tvm release because it is being packaged separately as a separate artifact.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11992#issuecomment-1295372985
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>