You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Arthur Ryman <ry...@ca.ibm.com> on 2007/02/26 06:21:33 UTC
RE: Renumbering assertions
Jonathan,
I updated the spec Part 1 and 2, and the test suite, documents. I
preserved the old assertion ids using a new attribute: @cr-id.
I generated 2 files that give the mappings of the old to new numbers:
renumber-assertions-1.properties [1], renumber-assertions-2.properties
[2]. These can be used in the Ant <replace> task to do bulk updates. Here
is the task from the test suite build.xml [3]
<target name="renumber-assertions" description="Renumbers assertions using
PR ids.">
<replace dir="documents" includes="**/*.xml, **/*.wsdl"
replacefilterfile="../wsdl20/renumber-assertions-1.properties" />
<replace dir="documents" includes="**/*.xml, **/*.wsdl"
replacefilterfile="../wsdl20/renumber-assertions-2.properties" />
</target>
John - I haven't updated the Woden code yet. Can you handle this?
[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/renumber-assertions-1.properties
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/renumber-assertions-2.properties
[3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/build.xml
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
"Jonathan Marsh" <jo...@wso2.com>
02/23/2007 11:16 AM
To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
"'John Kaputin \(gmail\)'" <ja...@gmail.com>, "'www-ws-desc'"
<ww...@w3.org>
Subject
RE: Renumbering assertions
The schedule is, if we can complete the small amount of editorial work
remaining (renumbering assertions would be the biggest part of it), get
LocationTemplate-2G working and regenerate WSO2ß à Canon message testing
results, and close the last few issues, we?ll be ready to go the PR. I?d
like that vote to occur next Thursday, but active discussion about what to
encode still continues?
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 4:21 AM
To: Jonathan Marsh
Cc: 'John Kaputin (gmail)'; 'www-ws-desc'
Subject: Re: Renumbering assertions
Jonathan,
I'll do the renumbering. I want to preserve the old numbers too so we can
provide mapping help for implementors and the test suite. I'll do this on
the weekend.
The 7-digit numbering scheme was introduced to minimize conflicts when we
had the team currently working on many sections of the spec. I'll cut it
back down to 4 digits which should be plenty. I'll reserve the first digit
to indicate the spec Part (1 or 2). That leaves 999 slots in each spec.
I'll also clean up any outstanding ed actions this weekend, My new
projects are preventing me from attending calls lately but I am highly
motivated to finish the ed work on the spec and move it to PR. What is our
schedule?
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
"Jonathan Marsh" <jo...@wso2.com>
02/22/2007 07:50 PM
To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "'John Kaputin \(gmail\)'"
<ja...@gmail.com>
cc
"'www-ws-desc'" <ww...@w3.org>
Subject
Renumbering assertions
Arthur,
Today in the WG call we discussed whether we should renumber the
assertions as we had planned to do. Some assertions use a 4-digit number
and others use a 7-digit number which includes a locator code. Presumably
they should all move toward the 7 digit code (though beyond indicating
which part of the spec the assertion is found in the extra digits don?t
prove that useful ? one can take the assertion number and use it as a
fragment identifier against the spec to locate the corresponding text.)
We however weren?t able to solicit a volunteer to do this work, which is
fairly substantial when one considers that any assertion number change
needs to simultaneously be changed throughout the test suite metadata. I
even reluctantly volunteered if the WG expressed a strong desire to
normalize these identifiers. It didn?t.
John did offer to try to fit in some work along this line, but first
perhaps it would be good to see how motivated you are to have consistent
assertion identifiers. Are you motivated enough to do some significant
editorial work?
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com