You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Andrzej Swatowski (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/07/18 11:40:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FLINK-28591) Array> is not serialized correctly
Andrzej Swatowski created FLINK-28591:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Array<Row<...>> is not serialized correctly
Key: FLINK-28591
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28591
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Table SQL / API, Table SQL / Planner
Affects Versions: 1.15.0
Reporter: Andrzej Swatowski
When using Table API to insert data into array of rows, the data apparently is incorrectly serialized internally, which leads to incorrect serialization at the connectors.
E.g., a following table:
{code:java}
CREATE TABLE wrongArray (
foo bigint,
bar ARRAY<ROW<`foo1` STRING, `foo2` STRING>>,
strings ARRAY<STRING>,
intRows ARRAY<ROW<`a` INT, `b` INT>>
) WITH (
'connector' = 'filesystem',
'path' = 'file:///home/jovyan/issue.json',
'format' = 'json'
) {code}
along with the following insert:
{code:java}
insert into wrongArray (
SELECT
1,
array[
('Field1', 'Value1'),
('Field2', 'Value2')
],
array['foo', 'bar', 'foobar'],
array[ROW(1, 1), ROW(2, 2)]
FROM (VALUES(1))
) {code}
gets serialized into:
{code:java}
{
"foo":1,
"bar":[
{
"foo1":"Field2",
"foo2":"Value2"
},
{
"foo1":"Field2",
"foo2":"Value2"
}
],
"strings":[
"foo",
"bar",
"foobar"
],
"intRows":[
{
"a":2,
"b":2
},
{
"a":2,
"b":2
}
]
}{code}
It is easy to spot that `strings` (being an Array of String) yields the correct values. However, both `bar` (an Array of Rows with two Strings) and `intRows` (an Array of Rows with two Integers) consists of duplicates of the last row in the array.
----
It is not an error connected with either a specific connector or format. I have done a bit of debugging when trying to implement my own format and it seems that `BinaryArrayData` holding the row values has wrong data saved in its `MemorySegment`, i.e. calling:
{code:java}
for (var i = 0; i < array.size(); i++) {
Object element = arrayDataElementGetter.getElementOrNull(array, i);
}{code}
correctly calculates offsets but yields the same result as the data is malformed in the array's `MemorySegment`.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)