You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to community@apache.org by "Ignacio J. Ortega" <na...@siapi.es> on 2002/11/28 12:31:13 UTC
CLA for nacho@apache.org
Hola a todos:
Somedays ago ( about 20 did ) i did send my Signed CLA to the FAX given
in the document itself, i've tried 2 times to get some confirmation of
the success, but nobody responded until now, i did send email to Jim
Jagielski, can anybody check and confirm that the document was received
correctly and is at his place causing the desired effect? thanks..
Saludos,
Ignacio J. Ortega
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Andr� Malo wrote:
> I agree with the terms described there (of course).
> IANAL, but I've some doubts that it has any legal relevance here in Germany
> (since it's not translated etc.). I'd like to hear some opinions/facts
> according to that topic.
You are entering into an agreement with a US incorperated of the state
Delaware. How exactly things are interpreted/handled is laid out in
various direct and indirect treaties and cultural agreements between the
US and, in this case, Germany.
And yes, there will be subtle differences between a US person signing the
same; but the essense (and in particular the protection it offers you as a
devloper) is essentially the same.
Dw
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by André Malo <nd...@apache.org>.
* Peter Donald wrote:
>> Contributor License Agreement, see
>> <http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf>
>
> It's a must (or should be a must) for all committers.
I agree with the terms described there (of course).
IANAL, but I've some doubts that it has any legal relevance here in Germany
(since it's not translated etc.). I'd like to hear some opinions/facts
according to that topic.
TIA, nd
--
Real programmers confuse Christmas and Halloween because
DEC 25 = OCT 31. -- Unknown
(found in ssl_engine_mutex.c)
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
André Malo wrote:
> * Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>
>>What's a CLA ?
>
>
> Contributor License Agreement, see
> <http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf>
>
> nd, who didn't filled it yet...is it a must or may or what?
Me ;-(
Ditto, it is mandatory ?
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:31, André Malo wrote:
> * Henri Gomez wrote:
> > What's a CLA ?
>
> Contributor License Agreement, see
> <http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf>
>
> nd, who didn't filled it yet...is it a must or may or what?
It's a must (or should be a must) for all committers.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
------------------------------------------------------------
militant agnostic: i don't know, and you don't know either.
------------------------------------------------------------
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by André Malo <nd...@apache.org>.
* Henri Gomez wrote:
> What's a CLA ?
Contributor License Agreement, see
<http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf>
nd, who didn't filled it yet...is it a must or may or what?
--
s;.*;aaaaaoaaaoaaaaooooaaoaaaomaaaa:a:alataa:aaoat:a:a:a
maoaa:a:laoata:a:oia:a:o:a:m:a:o:alaoooat:aaool:aaoaa
matooololaaatoto:aaa:o:a:o:m;;s:\s:\::g;y;mailto:;
\40\51/\134\137|ndparker <nd...@perlig.de>;;print;
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> Hola a todos:
>
> Somedays ago ( about 20 did ) i did send my Signed CLA to the FAX given
> in the document itself, i've tried 2 times to get some confirmation of
> the success, but nobody responded until now, i did send email to Jim
> Jagielski, can anybody check and confirm that the document was received
> correctly and is at his place causing the desired effect? thanks..
What's a CLA ?
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
This was rec'd on Nov 10, 2002 and an Email to nacho@apache.org
was sent on the 12th regarding the rec't.
At 12:52 PM +0100 11/28/02, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>Jim Jagielski / jim@apache.org is the right person to help you.
>
>Dw.
>
>On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
>
>> Hola a todos:
>>
>> Somedays ago ( about 20 did ) i did send my Signed CLA to the FAX given
>> in the document itself, i've tried 2 times to get some confirmation of
>> the success, but nobody responded until now, i did send email to Jim
>> Jagielski, can anybody check and confirm that the document was received
>> correctly and is at his place causing the desired effect? thanks..
>>
>> Saludos,
>> Ignacio J. Ortega
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org
>>
>>
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
Re: CLA for nacho@apache.org
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
Jim Jagielski / jim@apache.org is the right person to help you.
Dw.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> Hola a todos:
>
> Somedays ago ( about 20 did ) i did send my Signed CLA to the FAX given
> in the document itself, i've tried 2 times to get some confirmation of
> the success, but nobody responded until now, i did send email to Jim
> Jagielski, can anybody check and confirm that the document was received
> correctly and is at his place causing the desired effect? thanks..
>
> Saludos,
> Ignacio J. Ortega
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org
>
>