You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@uima.apache.org by Sylvain Surcin <su...@kwaga.com> on 2012/01/18 11:47:12 UTC
Status of UIMA C++ Framework
Hello everyone,
Are there any news about the current status of UIMA C++ Framework?
Last year I started porting an annotator from Java to C++ but I was stuck
with some issues, the C++ Framework being less advanced than its Java
counterpart.
For instance, it was not possible to do view name mapping in an aggregator.
I was told at this time that people was working to port the C++ Framework
to the same levels as the Java Framework.
Have there been any advances on this topic?
I would very much like to go on with this porting to C++ (mainly due to
performance issues).
Thanks a lot for any new,
--
Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
*KWAGA*
Senior Software Architect
15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
75013 Paris
France
Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
Re: Status of UIMA C++ Framework
Posted by Bhavani Iyer <bh...@gmail.com>.
The source should be available here;
http://archive.apache.org/dist/apr/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Sylvain Surcin <su...@kwaga.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I am currently trying to build your release candidate on Mac OS X.
> I am a little bit confused concerning the APR dependency: on APR's web
> site, there are no other sources to be downloaded than those for release
> 1.4.5 (and apr-utils 1.4.1). But when I try to build Uima C++, configure
> complains that it expects APR 1.3.x, which is nowhere to be found.
>
> Shall I edit the configure script or do you have any idea where I could
> find the sources for APR 1.3.x ?
>
> Sylvain
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> > Note that this url is pointing to a release candidate, and is not an
> > official release.
> > We are working to fix it up to make it a candidate we can vote on.
> >
> > -Marshall Schor
> >
> >
> > On 1/18/2012 10:21 AM, Bhavani Iyer wrote:
> >
> >> Sylvain,
> >>
> >> I'm working on a release of UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0. Please download and try
> >> the package at
> >> http://people.apache.org/~**bhavani/uimacpp-release-**
> >> candidates/2.4.0/02/<
> http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/>
> >>
> >> It contains a fix for the issue with sofa name mapping in C++
> aggregates.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bhavani
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sylvain Surcin<su...@kwaga.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Are there any news about the current status of UIMA C++ Framework?
> >>>
> >>> Last year I started porting an annotator from Java to C++ but I was
> stuck
> >>> with some issues, the C++ Framework being less advanced than its Java
> >>> counterpart.
> >>> For instance, it was not possible to do view name mapping in an
> >>> aggregator.
> >>>
> >>> I was told at this time that people was working to port the C++
> Framework
> >>> to the same levels as the Java Framework.
> >>>
> >>> Have there been any advances on this topic?
> >>> I would very much like to go on with this porting to C++ (mainly due to
> >>> performance issues).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for any new,
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
> >>> *KWAGA*
> >>> Senior Software Architect
> >>> 15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
> >>> 75013 Paris
> >>> France
> >>> Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
> --
> Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
> *KWAGA*
> Senior Software Architect
> 15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
> 75013 Paris
> France
> Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
>
Re: Status of UIMA C++ Framework
Posted by Sylvain Surcin <su...@kwaga.com>.
Thanks,
I am currently trying to build your release candidate on Mac OS X.
I am a little bit confused concerning the APR dependency: on APR's web
site, there are no other sources to be downloaded than those for release
1.4.5 (and apr-utils 1.4.1). But when I try to build Uima C++, configure
complains that it expects APR 1.3.x, which is nowhere to be found.
Shall I edit the configure script or do you have any idea where I could
find the sources for APR 1.3.x ?
Sylvain
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> Note that this url is pointing to a release candidate, and is not an
> official release.
> We are working to fix it up to make it a candidate we can vote on.
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
>
> On 1/18/2012 10:21 AM, Bhavani Iyer wrote:
>
>> Sylvain,
>>
>> I'm working on a release of UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0. Please download and try
>> the package at
>> http://people.apache.org/~**bhavani/uimacpp-release-**
>> candidates/2.4.0/02/<http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/>
>>
>> It contains a fix for the issue with sofa name mapping in C++ aggregates.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bhavani
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sylvain Surcin<su...@kwaga.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Are there any news about the current status of UIMA C++ Framework?
>>>
>>> Last year I started porting an annotator from Java to C++ but I was stuck
>>> with some issues, the C++ Framework being less advanced than its Java
>>> counterpart.
>>> For instance, it was not possible to do view name mapping in an
>>> aggregator.
>>>
>>> I was told at this time that people was working to port the C++ Framework
>>> to the same levels as the Java Framework.
>>>
>>> Have there been any advances on this topic?
>>> I would very much like to go on with this porting to C++ (mainly due to
>>> performance issues).
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for any new,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
>>> *KWAGA*
>>> Senior Software Architect
>>> 15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
>>> 75013 Paris
>>> France
>>> Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
>>>
>>>
--
Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
*KWAGA*
Senior Software Architect
15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
75013 Paris
France
Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
Re: Status of UIMA C++ Framework
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Note that this url is pointing to a release candidate, and is not an official
release.
We are working to fix it up to make it a candidate we can vote on.
-Marshall Schor
On 1/18/2012 10:21 AM, Bhavani Iyer wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> I'm working on a release of UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0. Please download and try
> the package at
> http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/
>
> It contains a fix for the issue with sofa name mapping in C++ aggregates.
>
> Thanks,
> Bhavani
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sylvain Surcin<su...@kwaga.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Are there any news about the current status of UIMA C++ Framework?
>>
>> Last year I started porting an annotator from Java to C++ but I was stuck
>> with some issues, the C++ Framework being less advanced than its Java
>> counterpart.
>> For instance, it was not possible to do view name mapping in an aggregator.
>>
>> I was told at this time that people was working to port the C++ Framework
>> to the same levels as the Java Framework.
>>
>> Have there been any advances on this topic?
>> I would very much like to go on with this porting to C++ (mainly due to
>> performance issues).
>>
>> Thanks a lot for any new,
>>
>> --
>> Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
>> *KWAGA*
>> Senior Software Architect
>> 15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
>> 75013 Paris
>> France
>> Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
>>
Re: Status of UIMA C++ Framework
Posted by Bhavani Iyer <bh...@gmail.com>.
Sylvain,
I'm working on a release of UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0. Please download and try
the package at
http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/
It contains a fix for the issue with sofa name mapping in C++ aggregates.
Thanks,
Bhavani
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sylvain Surcin <su...@kwaga.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Are there any news about the current status of UIMA C++ Framework?
>
> Last year I started porting an annotator from Java to C++ but I was stuck
> with some issues, the C++ Framework being less advanced than its Java
> counterpart.
> For instance, it was not possible to do view name mapping in an aggregator.
>
> I was told at this time that people was working to port the C++ Framework
> to the same levels as the Java Framework.
>
> Have there been any advances on this topic?
> I would very much like to go on with this porting to C++ (mainly due to
> performance issues).
>
> Thanks a lot for any new,
>
> --
> Sylvain SURCIN, Ph.D.
> *KWAGA*
> Senior Software Architect
> 15, rue Jean-Baptiste Berlier
> 75013 Paris
> France
> Tél.: +33 (0)6.32.78.83.31
>