You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@sentry.apache.org by "Alexander Kolbasov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/10 01:17:18 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (SENTRY-1800) Flaky testConcurrentUpdateChanges test

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alexander Kolbasov reassigned SENTRY-1800:
------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov  (was: Lei (Eddy) Xu)

> Flaky testConcurrentUpdateChanges test
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-1800
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1800
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Sentry
>    Affects Versions: sentry-ha-redesign
>            Reporter: Alexander Kolbasov
>            Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov
>              Labels: sentry-ha
>             Fix For: sentry-ha-redesign
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-1800.01-sentry-ha-redesign.patch
>
>
> The fixed for SENTRY-1795 was supposed to guarantee that we don't have any holes in the update tables.
> The ffix includes the new test {{TestSentryStore#testDuplicateNotification}}. This test passes sometimes but sometimes fails, for example:
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: 
> Expected :5000
> Actual   :4863
>  <Click to see difference>
> 	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
> 	at org.apache.sentry.provider.db.service.persistent.TestSentryStore.testConcurrentUpdateChanges(TestSentryStore.java:2977)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.FailOnTimeout$StatementThread.run(FailOnTimeout.java:62)
> {code}
> It fails here:
> {code}
>     List<MSentryPermChange> changes = sentryStore.getMSentryPermChanges();
>     assertEquals(numThreads * numChangesPerThread, changes.size());
> {code}
> meaning that some changes are missing. The question is whether they are missing with holes or we just have a shorter list?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)