You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@opennlp.apache.org by "Jim - FooBar();" <ji...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/08 12:53:22 UTC

instantiate a NameFinderME object passing a perceptron model?

Hello everyone,

Would it make sense to do this?:

new NameFinderME(model, generator, beam-size);

where model is a perceptron model? I suppose this is fine since there is 
no specific class for instantiting perceptron (NameFinderPE) models.

can someone confirm?

thanks in advance,

Jim

Re: instantiate a NameFinderME object passing a perceptron model?

Posted by "Jim - FooBar();" <ji...@gmail.com>.

cool thanks!

Jim

On 08/11/12 11:59, William Colen wrote:
> Yes, we keep the name for backward compatibility.
>
> William Colen
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <ji...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Would it make sense to do this?:
>>
>> new NameFinderME(model, generator, beam-size);
>>
>> where model is a perceptron model? I suppose this is fine since there is
>> no specific class for instantiting perceptron (NameFinderPE) models.
>>
>> can someone confirm?
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>>
>> Jim
>>

Re: instantiate a NameFinderME object passing a perceptron model?

Posted by William Colen <wi...@gmail.com>.

Yes, we keep the name for backward compatibility.

William Colen


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <ji...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Would it make sense to do this?:
>
> new NameFinderME(model, generator, beam-size);
>
> where model is a perceptron model? I suppose this is fine since there is
> no specific class for instantiting perceptron (NameFinderPE) models.
>
> can someone confirm?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> Jim
>