[jira] [Comment Edited] (HIVE-8934) Investigate test failure on bucketmapjoin10.q and bucketmapjoin11.q [Spark Branch]

["Xuefu Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14225688#comment-14225688 ] 

Xuefu Zhang edited comment on HIVE-8934 at 11/26/14 4:07 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Nice work. Just curious, since the changes are in common code, I'm wondering if MR or Tez would suffer the same problem then?

Also, if the table is bucketed, wouldn't we expect that all rows with the same key would go to the same bucket?


was (Author: xuefuz):
Nice work. Just curious, since the changes are in common code, I'm wondering if MR or Tez would suffer the same problem then?

> Investigate test failure on bucketmapjoin10.q and bucketmapjoin11.q [Spark Branch]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-8934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8934
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Spark
>    Affects Versions: spark-branch
>            Reporter: Chao
>            Assignee: Chao
>         Attachments: HIVE-8934.1-spark.patch
>
>
> With MapJoin enabled, these two tests will generate incorrect results.
> This seem to be related to the HiveInputFormat that these two are using.
> We need to investigate the issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)