You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> on 2007/07/19 10:06:40 UTC
[Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a few days back
with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in order that
it was understood that there were impacts on all these components.
The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1. This change arose from feedback on the release
candidate.
The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in place, but
we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk. A knock on
effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional "tuscany-"
prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be changed.
The components on this JIRA have just been reset to SDO-Implem, so it's
clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of the issue very
well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked people working in
the affected component areas to identify the places where this change
occurs.
Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the places which are
likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and better still
provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the changes
synchronously.
Kelvin.
Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was: [Java
SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven
artifact
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Raymond Feng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it different from
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec/1.0/?
>> If not, we can use the geronimo one and remove our own. Otherwise,
>> renaming the artifact id to tuscany-commonj-api sounds good to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>
> Good catch, it doesn't look very different, I'll try to see if we can
> just use it.
>
Under revision r562626 I have ported the tuscany-core module to the
commonj-api from Geronimo, which was almost identical to the Tuscany
commonj-api (the schedule methods were just throwing
IllegalArgumentExceptions instead of WorkExceptions).
Since it's not used anymore, if there is no objection I'd like to move
sca/modules/commonj-api to sandbox/contrib out of the main build,
planning to do this end of day on Monday.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was: [Java
SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven
artifact
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it different from
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec/1.0/?
> If not, we can use the geronimo one and remove our own. Otherwise,
> renaming the artifact id to tuscany-commonj-api sounds good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
>
Good catch, it doesn't look very different, I'll try to see if we can
just use it.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Is it different from
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec/1.0/?
If not, we can use the geronimo one and remove our own. Otherwise, renaming
the artifact id to tuscany-commonj-api sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <js...@apache.org>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was:
[Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api
maven artifact
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>> ant elder wrote:
>>> Ok the SDO changes for TUSCANY-1468 and TUSCANY-1437 and the associated
>>> SCA
>>> changes are in now. Can anyone confirm things still build ok for them so
>>> I
>>> know I've not left something out?
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Still building :)
>>
>> in the meantime I have a related comment. I think we need to change the
>> group id and artifact id for the commonj Work and Timer APIs under
>> sca/modules/commonj-api as well. Do you want to do it? If you're busy I
>> can do it as well if it helps.
>>
> Build is OK for me, after building SDO and DAS locally (not using the
> published snapshots as it looks like others are having problems with
> them).
>
> Any comments from anybody on the commonj-api? Any objections against
> renaming it to tuscany-commonj-api?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was: [Java
SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven
artifact
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>> Ok the SDO changes for TUSCANY-1468 and TUSCANY-1437 and the
>> associated SCA
>> changes are in now. Can anyone confirm things still build ok for them
>> so I
>> know I've not left something out?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>>
>
> Still building :)
>
> in the meantime I have a related comment. I think we need to change
> the group id and artifact id for the commonj Work and Timer APIs under
> sca/modules/commonj-api as well. Do you want to do it? If you're busy
> I can do it as well if it helps.
>
Build is OK for me, after building SDO and DAS locally (not using the
published snapshots as it looks like others are having problems with them).
Any comments from anybody on the commonj-api? Any objections against
renaming it to tuscany-commonj-api?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Group and artifact id for commonj Work and Timer APIs, was: [Java
SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven
artifact
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> Ok the SDO changes for TUSCANY-1468 and TUSCANY-1437 and the associated SCA
> changes are in now. Can anyone confirm things still build ok for them so I
> know I've not left something out?
>
> ...ant
>
>
Still building :)
in the meantime I have a related comment. I think we need to change the
group id and artifact id for the commonj Work and Timer APIs under
sca/modules/commonj-api as well. Do you want to do it? If you're busy I
can do it as well if it helps.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
Ok the SDO changes for TUSCANY-1468 and TUSCANY-1437 and the associated SCA
changes are in now. Can anyone confirm things still build ok for them so I
know I've not left something out?
...ant
On 7/27/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Happy to do this now or ASAP at your convenience.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 27/07/07, ant elder <antelder@apache.org > wrote:
> >
> > missed the dev list CC...
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: ant elder <an...@apache.org>
> > Date: Jul 27, 2007 10:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact
> > name
> > for sdo api maven artifact
> > To: kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk>
> >
> > When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do
> > the
> > associated changes as well?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 7/26/07, kelvin goodson < kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > With JIRA being down I'm going to try to attach the SDO part of this
> > > change to this note. This is the SDO patch for TUSCANY-1437.
> > >
> > > Kelvin.
> > >
> > > On 19/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok cool, ping me when you want to have a go and i'll help with the
> > sca
> > > > bit then.
> > > >
> > > > ...ant
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ant,
> > > > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that
> > the
> > > > > JIRA
> > > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I
> > did
> > > > > mention
> > > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > > > immediately,
> > > > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of
> > the
> > > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kelvin.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ant,
> > > > > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact
> > that
> > > > > the JIRA
> > > > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I
> > did
> > > > > mention
> > > > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > > > immediately,
> > > > > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect
> > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kelvin.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 19/07/07, ant elder < antelder@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437
> > a
> > > > > few days
> > > > > > > > back
> > > > > > > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as
> > SDO in
> > > > > order
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these
> > > > > components.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > > > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > > > > > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on
> > the
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming
> > in
> > > > > place,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the
> > trunk.
> > > > > A
> > > > > > > > knock on
> > > > > > > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an
> > additional
> > > > > > > > "tuscany-"
> > > > > > > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need
> > to be
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > changed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to
> > > > > SDO-Implem, so
> > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature
> > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > issue very
> > > > > > > > well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked
> > people
> > > > > > > > working in
> > > > > > > > the affected component areas to identify the places where
> > this
> > > > > change
> > > > > > > > occurs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the
> > > > > places
> > > > > > > > which are
> > > > > > > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and
> > better
> > > > > still
> > > > > > > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the
> > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > synchronously.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name
> > remain
> > > > > in the
> > > > > > > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with
> > the
> > > > > impl then
> > > > > > > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that
> > would
> > > > > give us a
> > > > > > > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot
> > of
> > > > > places
> > > > > > > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it
> > could
> > > > > be left
> > > > > > > till at least next week.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ...ant
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Happy to do this now or ASAP at your convenience.
Kelvin.
On 27/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> missed the dev list CC...
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ant elder <an...@apache.org>
> Date: Jul 27, 2007 10:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name
> for sdo api maven artifact
> To: kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk>
>
> When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do
> the
> associated changes as well?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 7/26/07, kelvin goodson < kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > With JIRA being down I'm going to try to attach the SDO part of this
> > change to this note. This is the SDO patch for TUSCANY-1437.
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > On 19/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok cool, ping me when you want to have a go and i'll help with the sca
> > > bit then.
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ant,
> > > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that
> the
> > > > JIRA
> > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did
> > > > mention
> > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > > immediately,
> > > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of
> the
> > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > >
> > > > Kelvin.
> > > >
> > > > On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ant,
> > > > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that
> > > > the JIRA
> > > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I
> did
> > > > mention
> > > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > > immediately,
> > > > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of
> > > > the
> > > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kelvin.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 19/07/07, ant elder <antelder@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a
> > > > few days
> > > > > > > back
> > > > > > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO
> in
> > > > order
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these
> > > > components.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > > > > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on the
> > > > release
> > > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming
> in
> > > > place,
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the
> trunk.
> > > > A
> > > > > > > knock on
> > > > > > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an
> additional
> > > > > > > "tuscany-"
> > > > > > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to
> be
> > > >
> > > > > > > changed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to
> > > > SDO-Implem, so
> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > issue very
> > > > > > > well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked
> people
> > > > > > > working in
> > > > > > > the affected component areas to identify the places where this
> > > > change
> > > > > > > occurs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the
> > > > places
> > > > > > > which are
> > > > > > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and
> better
> > > > still
> > > > > > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the
> > > > changes
> > > > > > > synchronously.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain
> > > > in the
> > > > > > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the
> > > > impl then
> > > > > > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that
> would
> > > > give us a
> > > > > > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot
> of
> > > > places
> > > > > > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could
> > > > be left
> > > > > > till at least next week.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...ant
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Fwd: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
missed the dev list CC...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ant elder <an...@apache.org>
Date: Jul 27, 2007 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name
for sdo api maven artifact
To: kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk>
When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do the
associated changes as well?
...ant
On 7/26/07, kelvin goodson < kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk> wrote:
>
> With JIRA being down I'm going to try to attach the SDO part of this
> change to this note. This is the SDO patch for TUSCANY-1437.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 19/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ok cool, ping me when you want to have a go and i'll help with the sca
> > bit then.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ant,
> > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the
> > > JIRA
> > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did
> > > mention
> > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > immediately,
> > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of the
> > > scenario when posting just now.
> > >
> > > Kelvin.
> > >
> > > On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <kelvin@thegoodsons.org.uk > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ant,
> > > > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that
> > > the JIRA
> > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did
> > > mention
> > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > immediately,
> > > > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of
> > > the
> > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > >
> > > > Kelvin.
> > > >
> > > > On 19/07/07, ant elder <antelder@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a
> > > few days
> > > > > > back
> > > > > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in
> > > order
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these
> > > components.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > > > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on the
> > > release
> > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in
> > > place,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk.
> > > A
> > > > > > knock on
> > > > > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional
> > > > > > "tuscany-"
> > > > > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be
> > >
> > > > > > changed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to
> > > SDO-Implem, so
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of
> > > the
> > > > > > issue very
> > > > > > well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked people
> > > > > > working in
> > > > > > the affected component areas to identify the places where this
> > > change
> > > > > > occurs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the
> > > places
> > > > > > which are
> > > > > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and better
> > > still
> > > > > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the
> > > changes
> > > > > > synchronously.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain
> > > in the
> > > > > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the
> > > impl then
> > > > > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that would
> > > give us a
> > > > > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot of
> > > places
> > > > > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could
> > > be left
> > > > > till at least next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > ...ant
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
Ok cool, ping me when you want to have a go and i'll help with the sca bit
then.
...ant
On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ant,
> sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the JIRA
> components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did
> mention
> in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> immediately,
> and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of the
> scenario when posting just now.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Ant,
> > sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the
> JIRA
> > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did
> mention
> > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> immediately,
> > and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of the
> > scenario when posting just now.
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > On 19/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a few
> days
> > > > back
> > > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in
> order
> > > > that
> > > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these components.
> > > >
> > > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on the
> release
> > > > candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in
> place,
> > > > but
> > > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk. A
> > > > knock on
> > > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional
> > > > "tuscany-"
> > > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be
> > > > changed.
> > > >
> > > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to SDO-Implem, so
> > > > it's
> > > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of the
> > > > issue very
> > > > well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked people
> > > > working in
> > > > the affected component areas to identify the places where this
> change
> > > > occurs.
> > > >
> > > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the places
> > > > which are
> > > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and better
> still
> > > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the changes
> > > > synchronously.
> > >
> > >
> > > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain in
> the
> > > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the impl
> then
> > > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that would
> give us a
> > > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot of
> places
> > > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could be
> left
> > > till at least next week.
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Ant,
sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the JIRA
components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did mention
in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking immediately,
and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of the
scenario when posting just now.
Kelvin.
On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Ant,
> sure, I wasn't planning to do it right now, but the fact that the JIRA
> components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up. I did mention
> in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking immediately,
> and the effect would be more subtle, but I forgot that aspect of the
> scenario when posting just now.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 19/07/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a few days
> > > back
> > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in order
> > > that
> > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these components.
> > >
> > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on the release
> > > candidate.
> > >
> > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in place,
> > > but
> > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk. A
> > > knock on
> > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional
> > > "tuscany-"
> > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to SDO-Implem, so
> > > it's
> > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of the
> > > issue very
> > > well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked people
> > > working in
> > > the affected component areas to identify the places where this change
> > > occurs.
> > >
> > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the places
> > > which are
> > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and better still
> > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the changes
> > > synchronously.
> >
> >
> > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain in the
> > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the impl then
> > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that would give us a
> > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot of places
> > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could be left
> > till at least next week.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name for sdo api maven artifact
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a few days
> back
> with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in order
> that
> it was understood that there were impacts on all these components.
>
> The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1. This change arose from feedback on the release
> candidate.
>
> The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in place, but
> we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk. A knock
> on
> effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional "tuscany-"
> prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be changed.
>
> The components on this JIRA have just been reset to SDO-Implem, so it's
> clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of the issue
> very
> well through that JIRA. In the body of the JIRA I asked people working in
> the affected component areas to identify the places where this change
> occurs.
>
> Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread, the places which
> are
> likely to break if we don't coordinate this change, and better still
> provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the changes
> synchronously.
It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain in the
maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the impl then
things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that would give us a
bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot of places
needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could be left
till at least next week.
...ant