Upgrade to Felix framework 3.0.7

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>]

Hi all,

After discussing with an user, to fix some Felix OSGi framework issue, 
we have to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7.
I haven't yet checked if Equinox defined is the latest version or not (I 
will do it too).

Anyway, the question is: I'm OK to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7 on the trunk 
(Karaf 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT), but I wonder if I merge the upgrade to Karaf 
2.1.x branch.

WDYT ?

Thanks
Regards
JB

Re: Upgrade to Felix framework 3.0.7

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>]

It's my thought too, that's why I remove 2.1.4 from the target releases 
in the bug (KARAF-385).

Go like this :)

Thanks guys
Regards
JB

On 01/13/2011 05:28 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Upgrade to framework 3.0.7 in karaf-2.1.x shot one of my projects to death :)
> This is ok for trunk, but shouldn't happen on minor/stability releases of karaf
>
> -->  Completely with Guillaume...
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:08:50AM -0800, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> +1 for upgrading trunk.
>> -1 on the branch unless there's a real need, as i've seen lots of regression
>> (or different behavior) around boot delegation and stuff like that
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After discussing with an user, to fix some Felix OSGi framework issue, we
>>> have to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7.
>>> I haven't yet checked if Equinox defined is the latest version or not (I
>>> will do it too).
>>>
>>> Anyway, the question is: I'm OK to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7 on the trunk
>>> (Karaf 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT), but I wonder if I merge the upgrade to Karaf 2.1.x
>>> branch.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com

Re: Upgrade to Felix framework 3.0.7

[Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>]

Upgrade to framework 3.0.7 in karaf-2.1.x shot one of my projects to death :) 
This is ok for trunk, but shouldn't happen on minor/stability releases of karaf

--> Completely with Guillaume...

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:08:50AM -0800, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> +1 for upgrading trunk.
> -1 on the branch unless there's a real need, as i've seen lots of regression
> (or different behavior) around boot delegation and stuff like that
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After discussing with an user, to fix some Felix OSGi framework issue, we
> > have to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7.
> > I haven't yet checked if Equinox defined is the latest version or not (I
> > will do it too).
> >
> > Anyway, the question is: I'm OK to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7 on the trunk
> > (Karaf 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT), but I wonder if I merge the upgrade to Karaf 2.1.x
> > branch.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com

Re: Upgrade to Felix framework 3.0.7

[Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>]

+1 for upgrading trunk.
-1 on the branch unless there's a real need, as i've seen lots of regression
(or different behavior) around boot delegation and stuff like that

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> After discussing with an user, to fix some Felix OSGi framework issue, we
> have to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7.
> I haven't yet checked if Equinox defined is the latest version or not (I
> will do it too).
>
> Anyway, the question is: I'm OK to upgrade to Felix 3.0.7 on the trunk
> (Karaf 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT), but I wonder if I merge the upgrade to Karaf 2.1.x
> branch.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com