You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by "Innes, Chris" <ch...@eds.com> on 2007/06/16 08:13:11 UTC
[Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Hi all,
I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved with
JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems possible to
expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these limitations.
I've been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot get it too work.
Can somebody please post a configuration, portlet.xml & web.xml, of a
Trinidad application exposed as a portlet that is functioning and that I
can try against my basic application.
I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
bridge.
Scott, I've noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on the
Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
information on that proof-of-concept?
Thanks,
Chris.
[Trinidad] Trinidad skinning guide
Posted by "Perkins, Nate-P63196" <Na...@gdc4s.com>.
It seems like the skinning guide for Trinidad on the Apache Myfaces site
is out of date.
I'm trying to recreate the Oracle ADF look-and-feel skin but using
Trinidad components, so far its just been trial and error and Firebug to
help me. Is there a way to get at the original Oracle ADF css file with
the skin selectors?
On another note, does anybody know what happened to the line that used
to separate content from header in the panelHeader component, I noticed
in Trinidad that it no longer has a separator...do I need to put a
separator component in there by hand for each panelHeader? Also, is the
skin selector for separator still af|objectSeparator or is updated?
(this prompted the first statement).
I'm trying to port to Trinidad, but I've got to be honest, the
documentation and available resources for skinning is poor!
Nate Perkins
480-441-3667
nate.perkins@gdc4s.com
Trinidad skinning guide
Posted by "Perkins, Nate-P63196" <Na...@gdc4s.com>.
It seems like the skinning guide for Trinidad on the Apache Myfaces site
is out of date.
I'm trying to recreate the Oracle ADF look-and-feel skin but using
Trinidad components, so far its just been trial and error and Firebug to
help me. Is there a way to get at the original Oracle ADF css file with
the skin selectors?
On another note, does anybody know what happened to the line that used
to separate content from header in the panelHeader component, I noticed
in Trinidad that it no longer has a separator...do I need to put a
separator component in there by hand for each panelHeader? Also, is the
skin selector for separator still af|objectSeparator or is updated?
(this prompted the first statement).
I'm trying to port to Trinidad, but I've got to be honest, the
documentation and available resources for skinning is poor!
Nate Perkins
480-441-3667
nate.perkins@gdc4s.com
>This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain GDC4S
> confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message.
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:darkarena@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:46 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
This reply is confusing. :) Oracle's 11 Bridge and Webcenter WILL work
with Trinidad. 10.1.3.2 will not.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11
> Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The
> reason for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces
> was released so there was little effort in making it fully complete.
> Since the 11 bridge was built around the Trinidad work (and takes into
> account much of the issues that will be provided by 301) we were able
> to provide a relatively stable Proof of Concept.
>
> Let me know if you have issues getting 11 to work and I'll help you
> our. It should be pretty straight forward though.
>
> Scott
>
> Innes, Chris wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
>> portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved
>> with JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems possible
>> to expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these
>> limitations. I've been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot
>> get it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration,
>> portlet.xml & web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet
>> that is functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
>>
>> I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
>> portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
>>
>> I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
>> bridge.
>>
>> Scott, I've noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on
>> the Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
>> information on that proof-of-concept?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
This reply is confusing. :) Oracle's 11 Bridge and Webcenter WILL work
with Trinidad. 10.1.3.2 will not.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11
> Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The
> reason for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces
> was released so there was little effort in making it fully complete.
> Since the 11 bridge was built around the Trinidad work (and takes into
> account much of the issues that will be provided by 301) we were able
> to provide a relatively stable Proof of Concept.
>
> Let me know if you have issues getting 11 to work and I'll help you
> our. It should be pretty straight forward though.
>
> Scott
>
> Innes, Chris wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
>> portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved
>> with JSR301. However, from what I’ve been reading it seems possible
>> to expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these
>> limitations. I’ve been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot
>> get it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration,
>> portlet.xml & web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet
>> that is functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
>>
>> I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
>> portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
>>
>> I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
>> bridge.
>>
>> Scott, I’ve noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on
>> the Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
>> information on that proof-of-concept?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey Chris,
The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11 Bridge
from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The reason
for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces was
released so there was little effort in making it fully complete. Since
the 11 bridge was built around the Trinidad work (and takes into account
much of the issues that will be provided by 301) we were able to provide
a relatively stable Proof of Concept.
Let me know if you have issues getting 11 to work and I'll help you our.
It should be pretty straight forward though.
Scott
Innes, Chris wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
> portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved
> with JSR301. However, from what I’ve been reading it seems possible to
> expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these
> limitations. I’ve been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot get
> it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration, portlet.xml &
> web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet that is
> functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
>
> I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
> portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
>
> I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
> bridge.
>
> Scott, I’ve noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on the
> Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
> information on that proof-of-concept?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris.
>
Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Because Trinidad needs to be standards compliant, we do not need this.
It was replaced by the Trinidad configurator mechanism which happens
regardless of the filter (the filter just makes it run earlier and
handles some of the usecases we havn't had time to research yet. If you
want to use Oracle's BC4J with Trinidad then you'll need to make sure
you have ADFFaces richclient in your classpath. This, at the moment, is
an Oracle extension to Trinidad and has a lifecycle listener that can be
used to initialize the Trinidad configurators before the first request
into faces, thus allowing BC4J to initialize correctly.
The name of this class is
oracle.adf.view.rich.portal.AdfFacesBridgeLifecycleListener (please note
the package has changed). I'm looking at a solution which would allow
the Trinidad Configurator to initialize earlier so that we can make this
listener obsolete, but for now you'll need it if you want to use BC4J
with Trinidad.
Scott
Innes, Chris wrote:
>
> Further to this, is there a Trinidad equivalent of the
> ADFFacesBridgeLifecycleListener?
>
> Trinidad functionality is implemented using the TrinidadFilter,
> wouldn’t a corresponding bridge listener be required?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris.
>
> *From:* Innes, Chris [mailto:chris.innes@eds.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, 15 June 2007 11:13 PM
> *To:* MyFaces Discussion
> *Subject:* [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
>
> Hi all,
>
> I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
> portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved
> with JSR301. However, from what I’ve been reading it seems possible to
> expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these
> limitations. I’ve been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot get
> it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration, portlet.xml &
> web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet that is
> functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
>
> I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
> portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
>
> I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
> bridge.
>
> Scott, I’ve noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on the
> Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
> information on that proof-of-concept?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris.
>
RE: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Posted by "Innes, Chris" <ch...@eds.com>.
Further to this, is there a Trinidad equivalent of the
ADFFacesBridgeLifecycleListener?
Trinidad functionality is implemented using the TrinidadFilter, wouldn't
a corresponding bridge listener be required?
Regards,
Chris.
From: Innes, Chris [mailto:chris.innes@eds.com]
Sent: Friday, 15 June 2007 11:13 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration
Hi all,
I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved with
JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems possible to
expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these limitations.
I've been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot get it too work.
Can somebody please post a configuration, portlet.xml & web.xml, of a
Trinidad application exposed as a portlet that is functioning and that I
can try against my basic application.
I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
bridge.
Scott, I've noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on the
Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
information on that proof-of-concept?
Thanks,
Chris.