You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com> on 2015/06/15 09:32:56 UTC
Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Hi guys,
I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone has
a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for
now.
Andy.
-----
--
Andy Gumbrecht
http://www.tomitribe.com
agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 on getting it out as-is.
IMHO, the community would enjoy seeing more release activity rather than
less. One now and one later with the improvements. It's been more than a
year of "real soon" already.
I think we just need to get started.
-David
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> I think we need to press on getting the milestone release out there, rather
> than wait. Its been too long already. I'm happy to volunteer to roll
> another release when the next OWB release is available.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
> >
> > Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> > Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> > 1.0-alpha-1
> > > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone
> > has
> > > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master
> for
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Andy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > --
> > > Andy Gumbrecht
> > >
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >
> > > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> > > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Gallimore
> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.
I still say go for it - Andy is working on the milestone release now. No
harm in doing a release now, and another one as soon as the next OWB
release is available.
Jon
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Le 15 juin 2015 10:02, "Jonathan Gallimore" <jg...@tomitribe.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> > I think we need to press on getting the milestone release out there,
> rather
> > than wait. Its been too long already. I'm happy to volunteer to roll
> > another release when the next OWB release is available.
> >
>
> We should get it this week so far before jira review will be done.
>
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
> > >
> > > Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> > > Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> > > 1.0-alpha-1
> > > > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless
> anyone
> > > has
> > > > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master
> for
> > > > now.
> > > >
> > > > Andy.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > > > --
> > > > Andy Gumbrecht
> > > >
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > > >
> > > > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > >
> > >
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> > > > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Gallimore
> > http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>
--
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Le 15 juin 2015 10:02, "Jonathan Gallimore" <jg...@tomitribe.com> a
écrit :
>
> I think we need to press on getting the milestone release out there,
rather
> than wait. Its been too long already. I'm happy to volunteer to roll
> another release when the next OWB release is available.
>
We should get it this week so far before jira review will be done.
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>
> wrote:
>
> > Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
> >
> > Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> > Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> > 1.0-alpha-1
> > > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless
anyone
> > has
> > > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master
for
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Andy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > --
> > > Andy Gumbrecht
> > >
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >
> > > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> > > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Gallimore
> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.
I think we need to press on getting the milestone release out there, rather
than wait. Its been too long already. I'm happy to volunteer to roll
another release when the next OWB release is available.
Jon
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
>
> Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> 1.0-alpha-1
> > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone
> has
> > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for
> > now.
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > --
> > Andy Gumbrecht
> >
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
--
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
It's a milestone Romain. It won't be perfect we know, but gives us a chance
to have feedback and take time to release OWB and other issues for
milestone 2.
So i'd say go for it anyway Andy.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
>
> Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> 1.0-alpha-1
> > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone
> has
> > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for
> > now.
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > --
> > Andy Gumbrecht
> >
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Yep. We picked Mx as that's what Eclipse was doing in their milestones.
So 7.0.0-M1 or something like that would be great.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Le 15 juin 2015 10:34, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> >
> > +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
> >
> > Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions
> we
> > 'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I
> just
> > want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
> >
> > On that note:
> >
> > commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
> > changes.
> >
> > javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
> >
> > Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same
> question
> > for api)
> >
>
> Pick the one you prefer, think nobody cares (while it is obvious it is not
> final it works). G used Mx a lot (would be M1 for us). Depends how many
> chars you accept to type in your pom ;).
>
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > --
> > Andy Gumbrecht
> >
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > --
> > View this message in context:
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Le 15 juin 2015 10:34, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
>
> +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
>
> Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions
we
> 'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I
just
> want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
>
> On that note:
>
> commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
> changes.
>
> javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
>
> Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same question
> for api)
>
Pick the one you prefer, think nobody cares (while it is obvious it is not
final it works). G used Mx a lot (would be M1 for us). Depends how many
chars you accept to type in your pom ;).
> Andy.
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> agree, lets get this baby out NOW :)
>
> (and ship a follow up in july)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 15.06.2015 um 10:13 schrieb agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
> >
> > Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions
> we
> > 'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I
> just
> > want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
> >
> > On that note:
> >
> > commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
> > changes.
> >
> > javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
> >
> > Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same
> question
> > for api)
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > --
> > Andy Gumbrecht
> >
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
agree, lets get this baby out NOW :)
(and ship a follow up in july)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 15.06.2015 um 10:13 schrieb agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>
> +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
>
> Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions we
> 'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I just
> want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
>
> On that note:
>
> commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
> changes.
>
> javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
>
> Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same question
> for api)
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
If I had to choose, I'd say to caps in milestone and a dash between
milestone and the number.
A detail though
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:13 AM, agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:
> +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
>
> Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions we
> 'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I just
> want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
>
> On that note:
>
> commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
> changes.
>
> javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
>
> Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same question
> for api)
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.
+1 Mark, but not for this roll.
Just started to really look this morning and there are a ton of versions we
'could' update now, but would take days to confirm the stability of. I just
want to get rid of/stabilise snapshots for this roll.
On that note:
commons-jcs will need a beta-2 release, as there have been significant
changes.
javaee-api - should we also go for 7.0-Milestone1 to align?
Is the TomEE version going to be Milestone1 or Milestone-1? (same question
for api)
Andy.
-----
--
Andy Gumbrecht
http://www.tomitribe.com
agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287p4675295.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
we should really go though the whole chain of update checks from time to time…
1.) update to latest apache-parent
2.) check versions:display-plugin-updates
3.) check versions:display-dependency-updates
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 15.06.2015 um 09:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
>
> Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
> Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
>> release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone has
>> a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for
>> now.
>>
>> Andy.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> --
>> Andy Gumbrecht
>>
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>
>> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
Re: Using geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used)
Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons
Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-alpha-1
> release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone has
> a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for
> now.
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>