You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2014/08/29 20:08:08 UTC

Radii8 code base passed IP Clearance

So, we are all set to commit to Git.  I was just going to put it in
flex-utilities or flex-external, but in light of the merge issues found
after TDF, should we just ask for a repo for it?  Is flex-radii8 ok with
folks?

Thanks,
-Alex

Re: Radii8 code base passed IP Clearance

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.

OK, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8285 will track the
request for the repo.

On 8/29/14 11:21 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

>Yes, please a separate repo. 'flex-radii8' sound appropriate ;-)
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> So, we are all set to commit to Git.  I was just going to put it in
>> flex-utilities or flex-external, but in light of the merge issues found
>> after TDF, should we just ask for a repo for it?  Is flex-radii8 ok with
>> folks?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: Radii8 code base passed IP Clearance

Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.

Yes, please a separate repo. 'flex-radii8' sound appropriate ;-)

EdB



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

> So, we are all set to commit to Git.  I was just going to put it in
> flex-utilities or flex-external, but in light of the merge issues found
> after TDF, should we just ask for a repo for it?  Is flex-radii8 ok with
> folks?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl