[jira] Commented: (FELIX-833) Woodstox xml processor bundle inclusion?

["Dieter Wimberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12649995#action_12649995 ] 

Dieter Wimberger commented on FELIX-833:
----------------------------------------

Tatu:

I have actually developed a StAX bundle for the Coalevo project, which is designed with a StAXFactoryService interface to have an OSGi compatible mechanism for creating StAX factory instances:
http://fisheye.coalevo.net/browse/stax/trunk/src/java/net/coalevo/stax/service/StAXFactoryService.java?r=6

The specific implementation is based on woodstox btw. (as can be seen on http://fisheye.coalevo.net/browse/stax as well).

Just wanted to mention it, because I think it would be good to have a "standard" way for using StAX in OSGi.

Also, probably the dev mailing list would be a better place for related discussions.

Regards,
Dieter




> Woodstox xml processor bundle inclusion?
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-833
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-833
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Bundle Repository (OBR)
>            Reporter: Tatu Saloranta
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Apologies for a vague entry: but I am hoping this is an ok way to introduce the thing.
> So: version 4.0.0 of Woodstox xml processor (http://woodstox.codehaus.org) has OSGi-enabled versions of its deliverables (jars). These are built using Ant and bnd task. This is done for the core Woodstox jar as well as supporting pieces.
> After doing this, it was suggested that I should check out if others might be interested in using these artifacts, whatever the method might be (i.e. getting copies of jars or something).
> Right now Woodstox project does publish these jars via Maven repos, even though build process is not done using Maven; they should be visible via Codehaus maven repo and replicated to other usual open Maven repositories.
> Anyway, I don't know if there is any work involved. I am excited about adding OSGi support, and am hoping it might make using Woodstox even easier.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.