You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Kyle Purtell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/04/21 20:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-26760) LICENSE handling should not allow non-aggregated "apache-2.0"

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17526070#comment-17526070 ] 

Andrew Kyle Purtell edited comment on HBASE-26760 at 4/21/22 8:47 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I tried this with brotli4j and the supplimental models approach did not work. PR#4353 for the curious. I am going to try it again based on review feedback. 

This is going to come up again, I am fairly certain. 


was (Author: apurtell):
I tried this with brotli4j and the supplimental models approach did not work. 

> LICENSE handling should not allow non-aggregated "apache-2.0"
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-26760
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26760
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: community
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, 2.4.9, 2.4.10
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.4.11
>
>
> our non-aggregated license check currently allows the malformed name "apache-2.0". All ALv2 licenses should be aggregated.
> - remove "apache-2.0" from the {{non_aggregate_fine}} list
> - figure out what dependencies are referring to this license and correct them in {{supplemental-models.xml}}
> nice to have: maybe add a precommit check that complains if the {{non_aggregate_fine}} set is changed?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)