You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> on 2010/07/21 09:31:19 UTC

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

Hi,

Recently in my company we moved from TeamCity to Hudson for two major
reasons:
- Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once)
while TC agent can build at most one project at a time
- Hudson knows Maven, i.e. after building project X it builds all projects
that depend on X

We even contributed a tool to Hudson that migrates TC configuration to
Hudson one, but I understand you already did that part.

So I'm +1 for the change, but I don't have permissions to the box where
wicketstuff.org is running.

2010/7/21 Michael O'Cleirigh <mi...@rivulet.ca>

> Hello,
>
> I've been using Hudson reliably to build wicketstuff core snapshot's and
> deploying them into the sonatype maven repository.  I put together an older
> machine for this purpose (P4 1.8Ghz) and while it worked at first recently
> there have been memory issues (at least one of the DDR1 DIMM's is bad and
> the JVM keeps crashing).   I have the builds running temporarily somewhere
> else but the long term solution is to run Hudson on a box that can be opened
> up to the other wicketstuff developers.
>
> My proposal is to replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson and then
> do the necessary setup to allow wicketstuff developers access to it for
> initiating builds and viewing the projects status.
>
> I am willing to do all of the necessary setup and configuration to make
> this happen; basically copying over what I have working right now plus
> adding in user authentication.
>
> The easiest way would be if I could get a user account on the
> wicketstuff.org server (at least initially) and then get everything setup.
>
> There are still some questions around if the wicketstuff.org box is still
> banned by sourceforge but I think the best way to find out the answer is to
> try and see what happens.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

Posted by Erik van Oosten <e....@grons.nl>.
>
> - Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once)
> while TC agent can build at most one project at a time
>    
Just to keep the facts straight: at my company we have several TC agents 
on one machine. Works without problems.

Regards,
     Erik.

Op 21-07-10 09:31, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently in my company we moved from TeamCity to Hudson for two major
> reasons:
>    
> - Hudson knows Maven, i.e. after building project X it builds all projects
> that depend on X
>
> We even contributed a tool to Hudson that migrates TC configuration to
> Hudson one, but I understand you already did that part.
>
> So I'm +1 for the change, but I don't have permissions to the box where
> wicketstuff.org is running.
>    


-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/