You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> on 2007/11/13 04:05:36 UTC
Lucene.Net 2.1 & 2.2
Hi folks,
My apology for my long absent from this mailing list. I have been very busy
with my work on a critical project.
Looking ahead, Lucene.Net 2.1 is near completion; it has been very stable
and only one NUnit test is failing, which is:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms(). Can someone look into it and offer
a patch? Once we get this out of our way, I believe we are ready to declare
Lucene.Net 2.1 "final" and release it.
In regards to Lucene.Net 2.2, I have already started looking into it and
generated a delta between Java Lucene 2.1 and 2.2; so the initial conversion
is underway such that I expect, over this coming weekend, to commit the
initial port and then we can start addressing issues accordingly.
Finally, working on Lucene.Net, is not easy and is very time consuming to
say the least! It takes considerable amount of my time with hardly anything
in return. If you are using Lucene.Net and find it valuable, consider
donation toward it to keep me motivated. If you can help, please visit my
website at: http://www.aroush.net/ to learn how or email me directly.
Regards,
-- George
RE: Unit Test Results
Posted by Michael Garski <mg...@myspace.com>.
I've traced down what is happening. The method Lucene.Net.Documents.NumberTools.ToString is returning an empty string for the first segment. This method can be altered to return "0" if the input parameter == 0.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgarski@myspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:33 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Unit Test Results
George,
I pulled the latest source from the SVN repository, building with the VS2005 solutions/projects and the test Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms() passes for me. I do see an error on Lucene.Net.Index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.TestExactFileNames:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.TestExactFileNames : incorrect filenames in index: expected:
_0.cfs
_0_1.del
_1.cfs
_2.cfs
_2_1.s0
_3.cfs
segments.gen
segments_a
actual:
_.cfs
__1.del
_1.cfs
_2.cfs
_2_1.s0
_3.cfs
segments.gen
segments_a
Which leads to another test failing... Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexFileDeleter.TestDeleteLeftoverFiles : System.IO.FileNotFoundException : _0_1.del
Has anyone else seen this?
Great news on 2.2! We're ready to pitch in on working though any issues after the commit of the initial port. Much thanks for all your work on this project.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Lucene.Net 2.1 & 2.2
Hi folks,
My apology for my long absent from this mailing list. I have been very busy
with my work on a critical project.
Looking ahead, Lucene.Net 2.1 is near completion; it has been very stable
and only one NUnit test is failing, which is:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms(). Can someone look into it and offer
a patch? Once we get this out of our way, I believe we are ready to declare
Lucene.Net 2.1 "final" and release it.
In regards to Lucene.Net 2.2, I have already started looking into it and
generated a delta between Java Lucene 2.1 and 2.2; so the initial conversion
is underway such that I expect, over this coming weekend, to commit the
initial port and then we can start addressing issues accordingly.
Finally, working on Lucene.Net, is not easy and is very time consuming to
say the least! It takes considerable amount of my time with hardly anything
in return. If you are using Lucene.Net and find it valuable, consider
donation toward it to keep me motivated. If you can help, please visit my
website at: http://www.aroush.net/ to learn how or email me directly.
Regards,
-- George
Unit Test Results
Posted by Michael Garski <mg...@myspace.com>.
George,
I pulled the latest source from the SVN repository, building with the VS2005 solutions/projects and the test Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms() passes for me. I do see an error on Lucene.Net.Index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.TestExactFileNames:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.TestExactFileNames : incorrect filenames in index: expected:
_0.cfs
_0_1.del
_1.cfs
_2.cfs
_2_1.s0
_3.cfs
segments.gen
segments_a
actual:
_.cfs
__1.del
_1.cfs
_2.cfs
_2_1.s0
_3.cfs
segments.gen
segments_a
Which leads to another test failing... Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexFileDeleter.TestDeleteLeftoverFiles : System.IO.FileNotFoundException : _0_1.del
Has anyone else seen this?
Great news on 2.2! We're ready to pitch in on working though any issues after the commit of the initial port. Much thanks for all your work on this project.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Lucene.Net 2.1 & 2.2
Hi folks,
My apology for my long absent from this mailing list. I have been very busy
with my work on a critical project.
Looking ahead, Lucene.Net 2.1 is near completion; it has been very stable
and only one NUnit test is failing, which is:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms(). Can someone look into it and offer
a patch? Once we get this out of our way, I believe we are ready to declare
Lucene.Net 2.1 "final" and release it.
In regards to Lucene.Net 2.2, I have already started looking into it and
generated a delta between Java Lucene 2.1 and 2.2; so the initial conversion
is underway such that I expect, over this coming weekend, to commit the
initial port and then we can start addressing issues accordingly.
Finally, working on Lucene.Net, is not easy and is very time consuming to
say the least! It takes considerable amount of my time with hardly anything
in return. If you are using Lucene.Net and find it valuable, consider
donation toward it to keep me motivated. If you can help, please visit my
website at: http://www.aroush.net/ to learn how or email me directly.
Regards,
-- George
Re: Lucene.Net 2.1 & 2.2
Posted by Karol Rybak <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hello I have a small question. Is lucene 2.1 capable of reading lucene
2.2indexes ?
On Nov 13, 2007 4:05 AM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> My apology for my long absent from this mailing list. I have been very
> busy
> with my work on a critical project.
>
> Looking ahead, Lucene.Net 2.1 is near completion; it has been very stable
> and only one NUnit test is failing, which is:
> Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms(). Can someone look into it and
> offer
> a patch? Once we get this out of our way, I believe we are ready to
> declare
> Lucene.Net 2.1 "final" and release it.
>
> In regards to Lucene.Net 2.2, I have already started looking into it and
> generated a delta between Java Lucene 2.1 and 2.2; so the initial
> conversion
> is underway such that I expect, over this coming weekend, to commit the
> initial port and then we can start addressing issues accordingly.
>
> Finally, working on Lucene.Net, is not easy and is very time consuming to
> say the least! It takes considerable amount of my time with hardly
> anything
> in return. If you are using Lucene.Net and find it valuable, consider
> donation toward it to keep me motivated. If you can help, please visit my
> website at: http://www.aroush.net/ to learn how or email me directly.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
--
Karol Rybak
Programista / Programmer
Sekcja aplikacji / Applications section
Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania / University of Internet Technology
and Management
+48(17)8661277