You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> on 2003/08/23 08:07:08 UTC
Apache 2.1 "Alpha" Release
An Alpha Type Release from HEAD has been discussed Several times in the past
months. It seems no one is against such a release. Just a Quick Refresh:
June 20:
"Once mod_ssl works again, I'd support doing a 2.1 release." - Justin
Erenkrantz -
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105606838827549&w=2
May 14: All replies in this thread supported a 2.1 release -
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105288987800003&r=1&w=2
There are even a couple more before those.
So. Are we going todo a 2.1 release anytime soon? Everyone can agree, but no
one does it.
-chip
Re: Apache 2.1 "Alpha" Release
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
There is one more detail for 2.1.0 (2.1.1?) alpha release, and that would be
the completion of the mod_includes labor that will hopefully eliminate the
subtle logic errors that users occasionally trip over. But very soon, keep in
mind that progress slows on this list in summer (as a rule.) When we all
go back to our caves for the winter - coders become more prolific :-)
Bill
At 01:07 AM 8/23/2003, Paul Querna wrote:
>An Alpha Type Release from HEAD has been discussed Several times in the past
>months. It seems no one is against such a release. Just a Quick Refresh:
>
>June 20:
>"Once mod_ssl works again, I'd support doing a 2.1 release." - Justin
>Erenkrantz -
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105606838827549&w=2
>
>May 14: All replies in this thread supported a 2.1 release -
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105288987800003&r=1&w=2
>
>
>There are even a couple more before those.
>
>So. Are we going todo a 2.1 release anytime soon? Everyone can agree, but no
>one does it.
>
>-chip
RE: Apache 2.1 "Alpha" Release
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:40 PM
> If making a release wasn't so complicated, I'd do one right now.
It isn't that complicated.
> Where can one find the most recently updated RM instructions these days?
Hmmm. Let's see...
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html
The only thing outdated is the running of the script. You should use
the following:
httpd-dist/tools/release.sh
Run it without arguments for usage info.
Basically, tag the 2.1 tree with APACHE_2_1_x and then run:
release.sh httpd-2.1 2.1.x
Sander
Re: Apache 2.1 "Alpha" Release
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
If making a release wasn't so complicated, I'd do one right now.
Where can one find the most recently updated RM instructions these days?
-aaron
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 11:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> An Alpha Type Release from HEAD has been discussed Several times in
> the past
> months. It seems no one is against such a release. Just a Quick
> Refresh:
>
> June 20:
> "Once mod_ssl works again, I'd support doing a 2.1 release." - Justin
> Erenkrantz -
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105606838827549&w=2
>
> May 14: All replies in this thread supported a 2.1 release -
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105288987800003&r=1&w=2
>
>
> There are even a couple more before those.
>
> So. Are we going todo a 2.1 release anytime soon? Everyone can agree,
> but no
> one does it.