You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Raj Raju <ra...@gmail.com> on 2017/02/08 10:37:00 UTC
[FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Hello Team,
Good Morning!!
Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
Thanks,
Raju Pedda .M
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Raj,
thanks, didn't saw your email when I reply.
If you want to help I can give you support. For what Harbs comment, it
seems Lizhi's code is good, but to be part of Apache Flex it would need a
refactor that would comprise, packages, imports and some wiring to make it
work nicely with the rest of Apache FlexJS code.
So, it would be great to help you in this task. Let me know about it.
Thanks
Carlos
2017-02-09 6:23 GMT+01:00 Raj Raju <ra...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Alex Harui and Carlos Rovira for your reply.
>
> And I wanted to help as a volunteer for Lizhi code base.
>
> Thanks,
> Raju Pedda .M
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, there are IP Issues with Lizhi's code. It isn't ready to
> > be part of Apache at this time.
> >
> > IMO, emulation of the Flash API surface belongs in a different community.
> > I'd prefer that our APIs do not have the word "flash" in them and make no
> > promise to implement Flash functionality. But if volunteers want to help
> > Lizhi clean up his code base, and bring it in here, I only have one vote.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 2/8/17, 2:54 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
> > >posted here:
> > >
> > >https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
> > >
> > >I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in
> > >order
> > >to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
> > >(gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
> > >
> > >I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get
> > >HTML5/WebGl
> > >capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
> > >But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial
> Apache
> > >FlexJS
> > >
> > >Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to
> > >develop/maintain
> > >it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
> > >
> > >Makes that sense?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Hello Team,
> > >> >
> > >> >Good Morning!!
> > >> >
> > >> >Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
> > >>
> > >> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on
> > >>the
> > >> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
> > >> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will
> > >>have
> > >> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
> > >> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
> > >>
> > >> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
> > >> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi
> is
> > >> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS
> > >>for
> > >> compilation.
> > >>
> > >> HTH,
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >
> > >Carlos Rovira
> > >Director General
> > >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > >http://www.avant2.es
> > >
> > >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> > >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> > >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
> vía y
> > >proceda a su destrucción.
> > >
> > >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> > >comunicamos
> > >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> > >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> > >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> > >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> > >nuestras
> > >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> > >necesaria.
> >
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I’m sure Lizhi would be more than happy to receive PRs on his repository: https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
I think the work that Lizhi has done is very good and I’d love to see it used, but I do agree with Alex.
Besides the IP issues which would need to be dealt with, I tried including Lizhi’s code in my own project which uses the FlexJS framework, and I had so many compilation issues with doing so that I needed to abandon that approach. The way I see it, it’s either the FlexJS framework OR Lizhi’s sprite framework. The two do not mix very well.
HTH,
Harbs
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Raj Raju <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Alex Harui and Carlos Rovira for your reply.
>
> And I wanted to help as a volunteer for Lizhi code base.
>
> Thanks,
> Raju Pedda .M
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, there are IP Issues with Lizhi's code. It isn't ready to
>> be part of Apache at this time.
>>
>> IMO, emulation of the Flash API surface belongs in a different community.
>> I'd prefer that our APIs do not have the word "flash" in them and make no
>> promise to implement Flash functionality. But if volunteers want to help
>> Lizhi clean up his code base, and bring it in here, I only have one vote.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 2/8/17, 2:54 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
>>> posted here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
>>>
>>> I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in
>>> order
>>> to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
>>> (gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
>>>
>>> I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get
>>> HTML5/WebGl
>>> capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
>>> But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial Apache
>>> FlexJS
>>>
>>> Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to
>>> develop/maintain
>>> it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
>>>
>>> Makes that sense?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Team,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Morning!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
>>>>
>>>> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on
>>>> the
>>>> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
>>>> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will
>>>> have
>>>> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
>>>> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
>>>>
>>>> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
>>>> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
>>>> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS
>>>> for
>>>> compilation.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director General
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>>>
>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>>
>>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>>> comunicamos
>>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>>> nuestras
>>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>>> necesaria.
>>
>>
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Raj Raju <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Alex Harui and Carlos Rovira for your reply.
And I wanted to help as a volunteer for Lizhi code base.
Thanks,
Raju Pedda .M
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are IP Issues with Lizhi's code. It isn't ready to
> be part of Apache at this time.
>
> IMO, emulation of the Flash API surface belongs in a different community.
> I'd prefer that our APIs do not have the word "flash" in them and make no
> promise to implement Flash functionality. But if volunteers want to help
> Lizhi clean up his code base, and bring it in here, I only have one vote.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 2/8/17, 2:54 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
> >posted here:
> >
> >https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
> >
> >I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in
> >order
> >to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
> >(gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
> >
> >I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get
> >HTML5/WebGl
> >capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
> >But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial Apache
> >FlexJS
> >
> >Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to
> >develop/maintain
> >it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
> >
> >Makes that sense?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hello Team,
> >> >
> >> >Good Morning!!
> >> >
> >> >Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
> >>
> >> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on
> >>the
> >> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
> >> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will
> >>have
> >> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
> >> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
> >>
> >> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
> >> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
> >> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS
> >>for
> >> compilation.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Carlos Rovira
> >Director General
> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >http://www.avant2.es
> >
> >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> >proceda a su destrucción.
> >
> >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> >comunicamos
> >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> >nuestras
> >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> >necesaria.
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
thanks for seeing the problem, I don't think that could be that... I'll be
creating another thread to see how should I overcome this problem without
the need to apply all DEFINES all over the code...
Thanks!
El 21 de febrero de 2017, 17:13, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
escribió:
> Strange … I could swear I pushed it, well I re-pushed and verified it’s in
> there now ☺
>
> Chris
>
> Am 21.02.17, 16:27 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>
> I did a rebase of the branch against develop for better handling
>
> El 21 de febrero de 2017, 16:26, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I think you finaly didn't commit that changes right? I don't see any
> > commit pending to pull in my source tree for "feature/spriteflexjs-
> > refactor"
> > thanks
> >
> > El 17 de febrero de 2017, 21:14, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> >
> >> Great Chris!,
> >> as I'm focused with AMF/RemoteObject, I try to end that and then go
> to
> >> that branch.
> >>
> >> Thanks for get that problem solved! :))
> >>
> >> 2017-02-17 17:30 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Carlos,
> >>>
> >>> I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import
> was a
> >>> JS only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and
> I
> >>> compiled. I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have
> a look.
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> >>> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> >>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based
> on MDL
> >>> with
> >>> the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
> >>> I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
> >>> hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's
> happening.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too …
> >>> typedef/externs
> >>> > >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
> >>> >
> >>> > I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
> >>> > external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Alex
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> Director General
> >>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >>> http://www.avant2.es
> >>>
> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> >>> contener
> >>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje
> >>> por
> >>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma
> >>> vía y
> >>> proceda a su destrucción.
> >>>
> >>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> >>> comunicamos
> >>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> >>> CODEOSCOPIC
> >>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del
> >>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de
> acceso,
> >>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos
> dirigiéndose a
> >>> nuestras
> >>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> >>> documentación
> >>> necesaria.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> Director General
> >> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> >> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >> http://www.avant2.es
> >>
> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> >> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje por
> >> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma vía y
> >> proceda a su destrucción.
> >>
> >> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> >> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo
> responsable es
> >> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> >> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted
> derecho
> >> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos
> dirigiéndose
> >> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> >> documentación necesaria.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director General
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> > http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > http://www.avant2.es
> >
> > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
> por
> > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
> vía y
> > proceda a su destrucción.
> >
> > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> > comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo
> responsable es
> > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> > prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted
> derecho
> > de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos
> dirigiéndose
> > a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> > documentación necesaria.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
> por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
> vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Strange … I could swear I pushed it, well I re-pushed and verified it’s in there now ☺
Chris
Am 21.02.17, 16:27 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
I did a rebase of the branch against develop for better handling
El 21 de febrero de 2017, 16:26, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think you finaly didn't commit that changes right? I don't see any
> commit pending to pull in my source tree for "feature/spriteflexjs-
> refactor"
> thanks
>
> El 17 de febrero de 2017, 21:14, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
>
>> Great Chris!,
>> as I'm focused with AMF/RemoteObject, I try to end that and then go to
>> that branch.
>>
>> Thanks for get that problem solved! :))
>>
>> 2017-02-17 17:30 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import was a
>>> JS only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and I
>>> compiled. I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have a look.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>>> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL
>>> with
>>> the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
>>> I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
>>> hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too …
>>> typedef/externs
>>> > >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
>>> > external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>>> >
>>> > -Alex
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director General
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>>>
>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
>>> contener
>>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
>>> por
>>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
>>> vía y
>>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>>
>>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>>> comunicamos
>>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>>> CODEOSCOPIC
>>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>>> nuestras
>>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
>>> documentación
>>> necesaria.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director General
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
>> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
>> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
>> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
>> documentación necesaria.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
I did a rebase of the branch against develop for better handling
El 21 de febrero de 2017, 16:26, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think you finaly didn't commit that changes right? I don't see any
> commit pending to pull in my source tree for "feature/spriteflexjs-
> refactor"
> thanks
>
> El 17 de febrero de 2017, 21:14, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
>
>> Great Chris!,
>> as I'm focused with AMF/RemoteObject, I try to end that and then go to
>> that branch.
>>
>> Thanks for get that problem solved! :))
>>
>> 2017-02-17 17:30 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import was a
>>> JS only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and I
>>> compiled. I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have a look.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>>> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL
>>> with
>>> the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
>>> I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
>>> hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too …
>>> typedef/externs
>>> > >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
>>> > external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>>> >
>>> > -Alex
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director General
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>>>
>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
>>> contener
>>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
>>> por
>>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
>>> vía y
>>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>>
>>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>>> comunicamos
>>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>>> CODEOSCOPIC
>>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>>> nuestras
>>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
>>> documentación
>>> necesaria.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director General
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
>> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
>> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
>> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
>> documentación necesaria.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
I think you finaly didn't commit that changes right? I don't see any commit
pending to pull in my source tree for "feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
thanks
El 17 de febrero de 2017, 21:14, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Great Chris!,
> as I'm focused with AMF/RemoteObject, I try to end that and then go to
> that branch.
>
> Thanks for get that problem solved! :))
>
> 2017-02-17 17:30 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import was a JS
>> only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and I compiled.
>> I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have a look.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL
>> with
>> the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
>> I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
>> hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> 2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too …
>> typedef/externs
>> > >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>> >
>> > I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
>> > external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>> >
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director General
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
>> contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
>> por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
>> vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>> comunicamos
>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>> CODEOSCOPIC
>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>> nuestras
>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
>> documentación
>> necesaria.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Great Chris!,
as I'm focused with AMF/RemoteObject, I try to end that and then go to that
branch.
Thanks for get that problem solved! :))
2017-02-17 17:30 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import was a JS
> only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and I compiled.
> I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have a look.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>
> Hi
>
> just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL
> with
> the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
> I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
> hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> 2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
> >
> >
> > On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too …
> typedef/externs
> > >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
> >
> > I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
> > external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
> por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
> vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Carlos,
I just had a look and your code had the problem, that the import was a JS only import and your code was JS-only. I added some defines and I compiled. I checked in the changes on your branch so you can have a look.
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 20:36 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
Hi
just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL with
the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
Thanks
2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs
> >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>
> I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
> external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi
just recreated all from scratch and made a new project based on MDL with
the some new code. Is a the most basic to keep things simple
I uploaded to a new branch " feature/spriteflexjs-refactor"
hope you guys could try it and get some clue of what's happening.
Thanks
2017-02-15 20:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs
> >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>
> I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
> external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
scope runtime is setup in "projects" pom.xml, but project/spriteflexjs
still fails if you try to build.
If you take a look at my branch you hopefully could see what happen in my
minimal example project
thanks
2017-02-15 22:09 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Ok … gee … think I still haven’t understood this completely ☹
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 20:24 schrieb "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> >Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs
> >should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
>
> I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
> external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi,
I will make a new thread for the current problem of spriteflexjs library
compilation since this is not in topic
2017-02-15 23:51 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Well the “type” is what we choose … also we can change the “classifier”s …
> the scope however is Maven-defined and we currently have to stick to that.
> But I’m happy to change naming, if that makes things easier.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 23:48 schrieb "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 1:09 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> >Ok … gee … think I still haven’t understood this completely ☹
>
> Yeah, it is a bit tricky. I've been wondering whether the terms we
> currently use "typedefs", "externs", "runtime", "provided" are Maven
> standards or whether we can change some of them.
>
> In the dual branch, I am currently changing things so the Core.swc and
> CoreJS.swc are more like peers. They both contain .JS files, but the
> library.swf in Core is for SWF and the library.swf in CoreJS is for
> JS. I
> just want to get this working now, cut a release, then look into
> packing
> everything into one SWC.
>
> In light of that, my latest attempt to make categories for SWCs says
> that
> there are categories like:
>
> 1) External "Platform and JS Framework API" swcs.
> Playerglobal
> Airglobal
> Js
> Jquery
> Createjs
> Most of the flex-typedefs except for GCL.
>
> 2) External "JS Framework SWCs with SWF Mocks"
> We don't have any in the main repos but in flex-tourjs the
> BarcodeScanner
> makes a SWC like this.
>
> 3) Google Closure Library External SWCs
> GCL.swc
> Someday, some others.
>
> 4) SWF SWCs
> Core
> Binding
> Etc.
>
> 5) JS SWCs
> CoreJS
> BindingJS
> Etc.
>
> Bucket 1 always goes on the external-library-path for SWF and JS.
> Different ones are used for JS vs SWF.
> Bucket 2 goes on the external-library-path for JS, but on the
> library-path
> for SWF
> Bucket 3 goes on the library-path for JS and is not used for SWF
> unless it
> has a SWF Mock
> Bucket 4 goes on the external-library-path for SWC
> Bucket 4 goes on the library-path for SWF
> Bucket 5 goes on the library-path for cross-compiling to JS
> Bucket 5 goes on the external-library-path for building the library.swf
> for a JS.swc although it is probably ok if it is on the library-path.
>
> From another perspective, the JS within a SWC either uses goog.require
> or
> not. GCL.swc uses goog.require, as will other GCL-compatible code,
> and as
> our JS files do. That's why they go on the library-path for JS. But
> when
> building a SWF, you either want the code from a SWC's library.swf in
> your
> application so you use library-path or you don't and you use
> -external-library-path.
>
> This makes me think we need an easier-to-understand way to mark what
> is in
> a SWC and have the Mojo figure it out from there. I think we are
> currently using
> Typedefs + runtime to mean that it is meant for JS but doesn't use
> goog.require
> Typedefs by itself means that is meant for JS and uses goog.require
> Provided and Runtime seem to have the same meaning?
> If no typedefs it contains runnable ABC
> If no typedefs but provided it is bucket 1 for SWF.
>
> I think we just want to mark whether a SWC contains JS and/or runnable
> ABC
> and whether it contains goog.require or not. I'm not sure we have a
> combination right now for bucket 2, and the keywords might not have
> enough
> meaning to others. Can we use different keywords? Classifiers like
> "JS",
> "ABC", "JS+ABC", Scope of "usesGoog"?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Well the “type” is what we choose … also we can change the “classifier”s … the scope however is Maven-defined and we currently have to stick to that.
But I’m happy to change naming, if that makes things easier.
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 23:48 schrieb "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>:
On 2/15/17, 1:09 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Ok … gee … think I still haven’t understood this completely ☹
Yeah, it is a bit tricky. I've been wondering whether the terms we
currently use "typedefs", "externs", "runtime", "provided" are Maven
standards or whether we can change some of them.
In the dual branch, I am currently changing things so the Core.swc and
CoreJS.swc are more like peers. They both contain .JS files, but the
library.swf in Core is for SWF and the library.swf in CoreJS is for JS. I
just want to get this working now, cut a release, then look into packing
everything into one SWC.
In light of that, my latest attempt to make categories for SWCs says that
there are categories like:
1) External "Platform and JS Framework API" swcs.
Playerglobal
Airglobal
Js
Jquery
Createjs
Most of the flex-typedefs except for GCL.
2) External "JS Framework SWCs with SWF Mocks"
We don't have any in the main repos but in flex-tourjs the BarcodeScanner
makes a SWC like this.
3) Google Closure Library External SWCs
GCL.swc
Someday, some others.
4) SWF SWCs
Core
Binding
Etc.
5) JS SWCs
CoreJS
BindingJS
Etc.
Bucket 1 always goes on the external-library-path for SWF and JS.
Different ones are used for JS vs SWF.
Bucket 2 goes on the external-library-path for JS, but on the library-path
for SWF
Bucket 3 goes on the library-path for JS and is not used for SWF unless it
has a SWF Mock
Bucket 4 goes on the external-library-path for SWC
Bucket 4 goes on the library-path for SWF
Bucket 5 goes on the library-path for cross-compiling to JS
Bucket 5 goes on the external-library-path for building the library.swf
for a JS.swc although it is probably ok if it is on the library-path.
From another perspective, the JS within a SWC either uses goog.require or
not. GCL.swc uses goog.require, as will other GCL-compatible code, and as
our JS files do. That's why they go on the library-path for JS. But when
building a SWF, you either want the code from a SWC's library.swf in your
application so you use library-path or you don't and you use
-external-library-path.
This makes me think we need an easier-to-understand way to mark what is in
a SWC and have the Mojo figure it out from there. I think we are
currently using
Typedefs + runtime to mean that it is meant for JS but doesn't use
goog.require
Typedefs by itself means that is meant for JS and uses goog.require
Provided and Runtime seem to have the same meaning?
If no typedefs it contains runnable ABC
If no typedefs but provided it is bucket 1 for SWF.
I think we just want to mark whether a SWC contains JS and/or runnable ABC
and whether it contains goog.require or not. I'm not sure we have a
combination right now for bucket 2, and the keywords might not have enough
meaning to others. Can we use different keywords? Classifiers like "JS",
"ABC", "JS+ABC", Scope of "usesGoog"?
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/15/17, 1:09 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Ok … gee … think I still haven’t understood this completely ☹
Yeah, it is a bit tricky. I've been wondering whether the terms we
currently use "typedefs", "externs", "runtime", "provided" are Maven
standards or whether we can change some of them.
In the dual branch, I am currently changing things so the Core.swc and
CoreJS.swc are more like peers. They both contain .JS files, but the
library.swf in Core is for SWF and the library.swf in CoreJS is for JS. I
just want to get this working now, cut a release, then look into packing
everything into one SWC.
In light of that, my latest attempt to make categories for SWCs says that
there are categories like:
1) External "Platform and JS Framework API" swcs.
Playerglobal
Airglobal
Js
Jquery
Createjs
Most of the flex-typedefs except for GCL.
2) External "JS Framework SWCs with SWF Mocks"
We don't have any in the main repos but in flex-tourjs the BarcodeScanner
makes a SWC like this.
3) Google Closure Library External SWCs
GCL.swc
Someday, some others.
4) SWF SWCs
Core
Binding
Etc.
5) JS SWCs
CoreJS
BindingJS
Etc.
Bucket 1 always goes on the external-library-path for SWF and JS.
Different ones are used for JS vs SWF.
Bucket 2 goes on the external-library-path for JS, but on the library-path
for SWF
Bucket 3 goes on the library-path for JS and is not used for SWF unless it
has a SWF Mock
Bucket 4 goes on the external-library-path for SWC
Bucket 4 goes on the library-path for SWF
Bucket 5 goes on the library-path for cross-compiling to JS
Bucket 5 goes on the external-library-path for building the library.swf
for a JS.swc although it is probably ok if it is on the library-path.
From another perspective, the JS within a SWC either uses goog.require or
not. GCL.swc uses goog.require, as will other GCL-compatible code, and as
our JS files do. That's why they go on the library-path for JS. But when
building a SWF, you either want the code from a SWC's library.swf in your
application so you use library-path or you don't and you use
-external-library-path.
This makes me think we need an easier-to-understand way to mark what is in
a SWC and have the Mojo figure it out from there. I think we are
currently using
Typedefs + runtime to mean that it is meant for JS but doesn't use
goog.require
Typedefs by itself means that is meant for JS and uses goog.require
Provided and Runtime seem to have the same meaning?
If no typedefs it contains runnable ABC
If no typedefs but provided it is bucket 1 for SWF.
I think we just want to mark whether a SWC contains JS and/or runnable ABC
and whether it contains goog.require or not. I'm not sure we have a
combination right now for bucket 2, and the keywords might not have enough
meaning to others. Can we use different keywords? Classifiers like "JS",
"ABC", "JS+ABC", Scope of "usesGoog"?
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Ok … gee … think I still haven’t understood this completely ☹
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 20:24 schrieb "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>:
On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs
>should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/15/17, 11:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs
>should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
I don't think that's true. Runtime scope puts you on the
external-library-path. GCL needs to be on the library-path.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Well actually I noticed this too this afternoon too … typedef/externs should always be added as “scope=runtime”.
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 19:50 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
Sorry message was sent before I put lines:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flex.flexjs.typedefs</groupId>
<artifactId>flexjs-typedefs-gcl</artifactId>
<version>${flexjs.typedefs.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<classifier>typedefs</classifier>
</dependency>
<!--
By declaring this dependency here, we force the flexjs-externs-js to
be
added to the external library path of all modules. Without this it
would
have gone to the library path.
-->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flex.flexjs.typedefs</groupId>
<artifactId>flexjs-typedefs-js</artifactId>
<version>${flexjs.typedefs.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<classifier>typedefs</classifier>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
So, this lines should be added to the pom.xml in my library that is in
"project/spriteflexjs", right?
For example Core.swc is using things classes from there (if I understand
right)
El 15 de febrero de 2017, 19:48, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Hi I assume that the lines that would make this work are in
> projects/pom.xml and are this:
>
>
> 2017-02-15 17:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/17, 4:45 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume
>> >it’s sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc)
>> >without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Sorry message was sent before I put lines:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flex.flexjs.typedefs</groupId>
<artifactId>flexjs-typedefs-gcl</artifactId>
<version>${flexjs.typedefs.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<classifier>typedefs</classifier>
</dependency>
<!--
By declaring this dependency here, we force the flexjs-externs-js to
be
added to the external library path of all modules. Without this it
would
have gone to the library path.
-->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flex.flexjs.typedefs</groupId>
<artifactId>flexjs-typedefs-js</artifactId>
<version>${flexjs.typedefs.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<classifier>typedefs</classifier>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
So, this lines should be added to the pom.xml in my library that is in
"project/spriteflexjs", right?
For example Core.swc is using things classes from there (if I understand
right)
El 15 de febrero de 2017, 19:48, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Hi I assume that the lines that would make this work are in
> projects/pom.xml and are this:
>
>
> 2017-02-15 17:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/17, 4:45 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume
>> >it’s sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc)
>> >without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi I assume that the lines that would make this work are in
projects/pom.xml and are this:
2017-02-15 17:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 4:45 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >
> >First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume
> >it’s sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc)
> >without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
>
> Correct.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/15/17, 4:45 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
>First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume
>it’s sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc)
>without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
Correct.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>.
JS typedefs should end up on the compiler's external-library-path. They're
only used at compile time. I'm sure there's a way to do that in Maven.
- Josh
On Feb 15, 2017 4:46 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Oh … sorry for that … I currently only have limited time to keep up here
> in the list and just want to solve Maven related impediments as quickly as
> possible ;-)
> I understood your problem as “why doesn’t it compile”, so I just fixed
> that ;-)
>
> Well the classes you are mentioning are in the js typedefs … I must admit
> that I can’t explain if the compiler should just take the JS in there or
> use the AS to compile a JS on the fly. Eventually Alex can help here …
>
> First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume it’s
> sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc)
> without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Am 15.02.17, 13:33 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> thanks but I think that's not what I asked for.
> I think Lizhi asked me to try to build ButtonExample since he thought
> if I
> could build that I could build his spriteflexjs project.
> I could refactor and fix the pom to make it build.
> Then I take the things learned from that to the spriteflexjs but didn't
> work for me.
>
> So, what I need help is in getting to know why spriteflexjs is not
> compiling things like "CanvasRenderingContext2D" or "HTMLCanvasElement"
> For that reason I offered you to upload spriteflexjs refactor to a new
> branch so you could take a look.
>
> Hope you understand now :)
>
> Thanks anyway! (and btw, just for curiosity...what is examples "native"
> folder?? do you know it?)
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-02-15 13:25 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de
> >:
>
> > Ok …
> >
> > I just committed some changes that let the two native examples
> “button”
> > and “map” build with maven. For the angular example I would need an
> angular
> > typedef, I assume. That’s currently not available so I think I won’t
> be
> > able to fix that one right now.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Am 15.02.17, 11:01 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have to admit, that I didn’t quite understand what the native
> > applications were … I just skipped them for now, but good to hear
> that you
> > guys managed to get them to build. But I still don’t quite understand
> > what’s “native” about them ;-)
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Am 15.02.17, 10:01 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag
> von
> > Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> > carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
> >
> > Hi Lizhi,
> > I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
> > What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
> > Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
> > Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I
> tried
> > to build
> > there is working right
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> >
> > > can you build this succuse?
> > > https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> > > examples/native/ButtonExample
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > spriteflexjs.com
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> > > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> > > for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive
> at
> > Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director General
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > http://www.avant2.es
> >
> > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y
> puede
> > contener
> > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> > mensaje por
> > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por
> esta
> > misma vía y
> > proceda a su destrucción.
> >
> > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999),
> le
> > comunicamos
> > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> > CODEOSCOPIC
> > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación
> > del
> > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de
> > acceso,
> > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos
> dirigiéndose a
> > nuestras
> > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> > documentación
> > necesaria.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
> por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
> vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Carlos,
Oh … sorry for that … I currently only have limited time to keep up here in the list and just want to solve Maven related impediments as quickly as possible ;-)
I understood your problem as “why doesn’t it compile”, so I just fixed that ;-)
Well the classes you are mentioning are in the js typedefs … I must admit that I can’t explain if the compiler should just take the JS in there or use the AS to compile a JS on the fly. Eventually Alex can help here …
First off … I have no idea, what the “native” is for … I would assume it’s sort of examples utilizing other JS frameworks (such as Angular etc) without using the FlexJS framework, but that’s just a guess.
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 13:33 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
Hi Chris,
thanks but I think that's not what I asked for.
I think Lizhi asked me to try to build ButtonExample since he thought if I
could build that I could build his spriteflexjs project.
I could refactor and fix the pom to make it build.
Then I take the things learned from that to the spriteflexjs but didn't
work for me.
So, what I need help is in getting to know why spriteflexjs is not
compiling things like "CanvasRenderingContext2D" or "HTMLCanvasElement"
For that reason I offered you to upload spriteflexjs refactor to a new
branch so you could take a look.
Hope you understand now :)
Thanks anyway! (and btw, just for curiosity...what is examples "native"
folder?? do you know it?)
2017-02-15 13:25 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Ok …
>
> I just committed some changes that let the two native examples “button”
> and “map” build with maven. For the angular example I would need an angular
> typedef, I assume. That’s currently not available so I think I won’t be
> able to fix that one right now.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 11:01 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have to admit, that I didn’t quite understand what the native
> applications were … I just skipped them for now, but good to hear that you
> guys managed to get them to build. But I still don’t quite understand
> what’s “native” about them ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 10:01 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>
> Hi Lizhi,
> I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
> What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
> Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
> Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried
> to build
> there is working right
>
>
> 2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
> > can you build this succuse?
> > https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> > examples/native/ButtonExample
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > spriteflexjs.com
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> > for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación
> del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de
> acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
thanks but I think that's not what I asked for.
I think Lizhi asked me to try to build ButtonExample since he thought if I
could build that I could build his spriteflexjs project.
I could refactor and fix the pom to make it build.
Then I take the things learned from that to the spriteflexjs but didn't
work for me.
So, what I need help is in getting to know why spriteflexjs is not
compiling things like "CanvasRenderingContext2D" or "HTMLCanvasElement"
For that reason I offered you to upload spriteflexjs refactor to a new
branch so you could take a look.
Hope you understand now :)
Thanks anyway! (and btw, just for curiosity...what is examples "native"
folder?? do you know it?)
2017-02-15 13:25 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Ok …
>
> I just committed some changes that let the two native examples “button”
> and “map” build with maven. For the angular example I would need an angular
> typedef, I assume. That’s currently not available so I think I won’t be
> able to fix that one right now.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 11:01 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have to admit, that I didn’t quite understand what the native
> applications were … I just skipped them for now, but good to hear that you
> guys managed to get them to build. But I still don’t quite understand
> what’s “native” about them ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 10:01 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
>
> Hi Lizhi,
> I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
> What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
> Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
> Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried
> to build
> there is working right
>
>
> 2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
> > can you build this succuse?
> > https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> > examples/native/ButtonExample
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > spriteflexjs.com
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> > for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
> contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación
> del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de
> acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Ok …
I just committed some changes that let the two native examples “button” and “map” build with maven. For the angular example I would need an angular typedef, I assume. That’s currently not available so I think I won’t be able to fix that one right now.
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 11:01 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
Hi guys,
I have to admit, that I didn’t quite understand what the native applications were … I just skipped them for now, but good to hear that you guys managed to get them to build. But I still don’t quite understand what’s “native” about them ;-)
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 10:01 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
Hi Lizhi,
I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried to build
there is working right
2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> can you build this succuse?
> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> examples/native/ButtonExample
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi guys,
I have to admit, that I didn’t quite understand what the native applications were … I just skipped them for now, but good to hear that you guys managed to get them to build. But I still don’t quite understand what’s “native” about them ;-)
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 10:01 schrieb "carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>:
Hi Lizhi,
I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried to build
there is working right
2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> can you build this succuse?
> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> examples/native/ButtonExample
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
just refactored ButtonExample to build with maven. I get it using some
dependencies setup by Chris in parent pom. Just upload to Git
I'll try the changes I did with spriteflexjs version and report what happen.
El 15 de febrero de 2017, 10:01, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> escribió:
> Hi Lizhi,
> I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
> What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
> Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
> Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried to build
> there is working right
>
>
> 2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
>> can you build this succuse?
>> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/examples/
>> native/ButtonExample
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> spriteflexjs.com
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development
>> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-
>> production-tp59129p59421.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
I tried it and doesn't build with maven.
What's "native" folder example? I never tried examples here
Seems Om examples to test FlexJS with AngulaJS and others...
Until now I was focused on "examples/flexjs" folder, all I tried to build
there is working right
2017-02-15 9:04 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> can you build this succuse?
> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/
> examples/native/ButtonExample
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59421.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by lizhi <sl...@qq.com>.
can you build this succuse?
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/examples/native/ButtonExample
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59421.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
btw, forgot to mention, that after introduce licensing and other things, I
still stuck trying to compile things like
"CanvasRenderingContext2D" or "HTMLCanvasElement"
someone can give a clue?
Thanks!
2017-02-15 8:24 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>:
> Hi Lizhi,
>
> if we want the software could be widely used we can't rely on a setup that
> would not take into account more scenarios.
> Take into account that IT departments use more stablished tools, and maven
> is one heavily used
> For example, at my company, if there's no maven support, then there's no
> way to use the library, since all the building
> is managed by CI servers.
>
> For that reason that's very important task.
>
> btw, yesterday I had to introduce a LICENSE text in all files in order to
> pass rat check in maven.
> That's all cumbersome task, but must be done in order to put the software
> where it deserves
>
> hope you understand
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> 2017-02-15 6:53 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
>>
>> I do not understand mvn, but suggest that you can try my command line, it
>> is
>> very simple, only one line
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> spriteflexjs.com
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development
>> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-
>> production-tp59129p59417.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> documentación necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
if we want the software could be widely used we can't rely on a setup that
would not take into account more scenarios.
Take into account that IT departments use more stablished tools, and maven
is one heavily used
For example, at my company, if there's no maven support, then there's no
way to use the library, since all the building
is managed by CI servers.
For that reason that's very important task.
btw, yesterday I had to introduce a LICENSE text in all files in order to
pass rat check in maven.
That's all cumbersome task, but must be done in order to put the software
where it deserves
hope you understand
Thanks
2017-02-15 6:53 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
> I do not understand mvn, but suggest that you can try my command line, it
> is
> very simple, only one line
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59417.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
could you help me to see what's needed in my pom in order to get the missed
entities and get more near to a sucessfull build?
I propose to upload my refactor of spriteflexjs to a branch so you could
take a look.
Thanks
2017-02-15 10:25 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Hi,
>
> If you want to understand it a little more and have a little less than 2
> hours to spare. I would suggest watching the Maven training video Justin
> and I did last year in Vancouver:
> https://vimeo.com/167857327
>
> Chris
>
> Am 15.02.17, 06:53 schrieb "lizhi" <sl...@qq.com>:
>
>
> I do not understand mvn, but suggest that you can try my command line,
> it is
> very simple, only one line
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59417.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi,
If you want to understand it a little more and have a little less than 2 hours to spare. I would suggest watching the Maven training video Justin and I did last year in Vancouver:
https://vimeo.com/167857327
Chris
Am 15.02.17, 06:53 schrieb "lizhi" <sl...@qq.com>:
I do not understand mvn, but suggest that you can try my command line, it is
very simple, only one line
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59417.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by lizhi <sl...@qq.com>.
I do not understand mvn, but suggest that you can try my command line, it is
very simple, only one line
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59417.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Josh,
thanks for the tip. I tried to add it to the pom:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flex.flexjs.typedefs</groupId>
<artifactId>flexjs-typedefs-js</artifactId>
<version>0.8.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<type>swc</type>
<classifier>typedefs</classifier>
</dependency>
but compilation fails in the same way.
I'm a bit lost here :?
2017-02-14 17:04 GMT+01:00 Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>:
> You'll need to reference the js.swc typedefs.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Lizhi,
> >
> > I'm giving a try.
> >
> > The easiest way for me was trying to put the sprites folder in my
> flex-asjs
> > framework/projects folder and create a pom.xml similar to other libraries
> > there.
> > Then maven requires "main/flex" structure.
> > As I try to compile I get a lots of errors. That's normal for now since
> > it's a matter of expected structure.
> >
> > The first one I need help is some html/webgl APIs:
> >
> > [-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/
> > flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/target/
> > compile-as-config.xml]
> > Loading configuration:
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/
> frameworks/projects/
> > spriteflexjs/target/compile-as-config.xml
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/
> frameworks/projects/
> > spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/BaseRenderer.as(34):
> > col: 47 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
> > CanvasRenderingContext2D.
> > override public function
> > renderGraphics(ctx:CanvasRenderingContext2D,g:
> Graphics,m:Matrix,blendMode:
> > String,colorTransform:ColorTransform):void{
> >
> > or
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/
> frameworks/projects/
> > spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/GLCanvasRenderingContext2D.as(
> > 28):
> > col: 23 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
> > HTMLCanvasElement.
> > public var canvas : HTMLCanvasElement;
> > ^
> >
> > It seems Canvas API are not recognized.
> >
> > So how do you do to compile this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-14 11:19 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> >
> > > thank you too.
> > > i do not test on the mvn.
> > > but it is baseon the bat.
> > > https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/wiki/how-run
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > spriteflexjs.com
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> > > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> > > for-production-tp59129p59381.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director General
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > http://www.avant2.es
> >
> > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía
> y
> > proceda a su destrucción.
> >
> > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos
> > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> nuestras
> > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> > necesaria.
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>.
You'll need to reference the js.swc typedefs.
- Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Lizhi,
>
> I'm giving a try.
>
> The easiest way for me was trying to put the sprites folder in my flex-asjs
> framework/projects folder and create a pom.xml similar to other libraries
> there.
> Then maven requires "main/flex" structure.
> As I try to compile I get a lots of errors. That's normal for now since
> it's a matter of expected structure.
>
> The first one I need help is some html/webgl APIs:
>
> [-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/
> flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/target/
> compile-as-config.xml]
> Loading configuration:
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/
> spriteflexjs/target/compile-as-config.xml
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/
> spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/BaseRenderer.as(34):
> col: 47 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
> CanvasRenderingContext2D.
> override public function
> renderGraphics(ctx:CanvasRenderingContext2D,g:Graphics,m:Matrix,blendMode:
> String,colorTransform:ColorTransform):void{
>
> or
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/
> spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/GLCanvasRenderingContext2D.as(
> 28):
> col: 23 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
> HTMLCanvasElement.
> public var canvas : HTMLCanvasElement;
> ^
>
> It seems Canvas API are not recognized.
>
> So how do you do to compile this?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 2017-02-14 11:19 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
> > thank you too.
> > i do not test on the mvn.
> > but it is baseon the bat.
> > https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/wiki/how-run
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > spriteflexjs.com
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> > for-production-tp59129p59381.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
I'm giving a try.
The easiest way for me was trying to put the sprites folder in my flex-asjs
framework/projects folder and create a pom.xml similar to other libraries
there.
Then maven requires "main/flex" structure.
As I try to compile I get a lots of errors. That's normal for now since
it's a matter of expected structure.
The first one I need help is some html/webgl APIs:
[-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/target/compile-as-config.xml]
Loading configuration:
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/target/compile-as-config.xml
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/BaseRenderer.as(34):
col: 47 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
CanvasRenderingContext2D.
override public function
renderGraphics(ctx:CanvasRenderingContext2D,g:Graphics,m:Matrix,blendMode:String,colorTransform:ColorTransform):void{
or
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/source/flexjs/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/spriteflexjs/src/main/flex/flash/__native/GLCanvasRenderingContext2D.as(28):
col: 23 Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
HTMLCanvasElement.
public var canvas : HTMLCanvasElement;
^
It seems Canvas API are not recognized.
So how do you do to compile this?
Thanks
2017-02-14 11:19 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> thank you too.
> i do not test on the mvn.
> but it is baseon the bat.
> https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/wiki/how-run
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59381.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by lizhi <sl...@qq.com>.
thank you too.
i do not test on the mvn.
but it is baseon the bat.
https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/wiki/how-run
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59381.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
I'll try to get some time to download spriteflexjs and mavenize it to try
and report here.
thanks
2017-02-14 11:13 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
>
> I have downloaded the latest version many times. Has not found the
> problem.https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/issues/
> 10#issuecomment-279165933
> This link is friends three days ago to download the 0.8 version, but also
> successfully compiled through. I think spriteflexjs does not have
> compilation problems. Where you are being given, can be sent to me, or
> github. I do not know where there is a problem with compilation
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59379.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by lizhi <sl...@qq.com>.
I have downloaded the latest version many times. Has not found the
problem.https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/issues/10#issuecomment-279165933
This link is friends three days ago to download the 0.8 version, but also
successfully compiled through. I think spriteflexjs does not have
compilation problems. Where you are being given, can be sent to me, or
github. I do not know where there is a problem with compilation
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59379.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Lizhi,
in order to get more usable your library I think it will need to be tested
with Actual Apache FlexJS 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT and see what errors you find and
try to fix it.
People reported that trying to use it with actual FlexJS was not possible
since it was generating errors.
What do you think about it?
2017-02-14 4:39 GMT+01:00 lizhi <sl...@qq.com>:
> agree you.
>
> and
>
> Put bug.
> Help with publicity.
> Do the test game.
>
> all can help the proj
>
>
>
> -----
> spriteflexjs.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-
> for-production-tp59129p59363.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by lizhi <sl...@qq.com>.
agree you.
and
Put bug.
Help with publicity.
Do the test game.
all can help the proj
-----
spriteflexjs.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Is-FlexJS-ready-for-production-tp59129p59363.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>.
Pull requests are a great way to contribute to the project. I submitted a
bug fix a while back, and Lizhi accepted it quickly.
- Josh
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/9/17, 1:59 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >And what about start a project in Github for a port of Lizhis code?
> >That would keep it separate, and we could make it compatible with our
> >code.
> >I think Lizhi is not very close to this project and maybe he could
> >continue
> >his work
> >in his own code, maybe not... In a perfect world he could lead the effort
> >and
> >maintain and evolution his own code base to work close to Apache FlexJS
> >but at least for now, that seem's not the case...
>
> IMO, it is best to make a serious effort to work in cooperation instead of
> forking. IOW, help Lizhi build a community around his code. He is using
> FalconJX to compile so he has interest in working with us to some degree.
> There is a language barrier though.
>
> So, folks who are interested should offer pull requests on his GitHub
> repo. Once it is more ready we can take a vote on whether we should
> import it into our project, set up a new project, or just use it as a
> third-party dependency. I don't have the time to spend any cycles on it.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/9/17, 1:59 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>And what about start a project in Github for a port of Lizhis code?
>That would keep it separate, and we could make it compatible with our
>code.
>I think Lizhi is not very close to this project and maybe he could
>continue
>his work
>in his own code, maybe not... In a perfect world he could lead the effort
>and
>maintain and evolution his own code base to work close to Apache FlexJS
>but at least for now, that seem's not the case...
IMO, it is best to make a serious effort to work in cooperation instead of
forking. IOW, help Lizhi build a community around his code. He is using
FalconJX to compile so he has interest in working with us to some degree.
There is a language barrier though.
So, folks who are interested should offer pull requests on his GitHub
repo. Once it is more ready we can take a vote on whether we should
import it into our project, set up a new project, or just use it as a
third-party dependency. I don't have the time to spend any cycles on it.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
And what about start a project in Github for a port of Lizhis code?
That would keep it separate, and we could make it compatible with our code.
I think Lizhi is not very close to this project and maybe he could continue
his work
in his own code, maybe not... In a perfect world he could lead the effort
and
maintain and evolution his own code base to work close to Apache FlexJS
but at least for now, that seem's not the case...
2017-02-09 18:38 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
> On Feb 9, 2017 8:15 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/9/17, 12:58 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I think it would be great to refactor ir and bring it here. Although, I
> >have some things on my plate already, so maybe more later.
>
> If folks help Lizhi clean it up and we get enough votes to bring it here,
> then I won't stand in the way. Let me point out some reasons not to bring
> it here for folks to think about:
>
> 1) Apache doesn't like "umbrella projects". I don't exactly know why and
> haven't dug into it, but apparently there were some umbrella projects in
> the past that ran into trouble and the solution was to split the big
> project into several projects. Starting up a project is definitely harder
> than bringing in code to an existing project, so I understand the
> temptation to keep bringing more things under Apache Flex.
>
> 2) Scalability: In one vision of a wildly successful future for FlexJS,
> we'd ship even fewer SWCs than we do now. The Jquery folks would take
> over the Jquery SWCs. They'd export the code from our repos to their
> repos and release them on their own schedule. We would remove the code
> from our repos. Same for CreateJS, GoogleMaps, etc. IMO, we are only
> providing these SWCs for now as a proof of concept. I can't imagine the
> amount of list traffic involved if we had one huge monolithic release of
> every AS library in the world.
>
>
> I get what you are saying, but this does not usually happen. Angular,
> Typescript etc shims for popular libraries like Highcharts, D3 etc. are
> maintained by volunteers who are not affiliated to either the framework or
> the library. I believe that is healthy situation.
>
> That said, I think if the version of Starling that Lizhi is developing is
> a separate apache project, it would attract the right kind of community.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
> And I can't imagine the amount of list
> traffic if we had 200 third-party libraries all on their own release
> schedule. In short, I would prefer that we build an ecosystem of
> third-parties rather than have everyone have to go through our community
> in order to release. Even JIRA doesn't really handle categorization of
> bugs in a hierarchical fashion.
>
> So, I'm not sure what the right answer is, but we'll discuss it more when
> Lizhi's code becomes more ready.
>
> -Alex
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 9, 2017 8:15 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
On 2/9/17, 12:58 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I think it would be great to refactor ir and bring it here. Although, I
>have some things on my plate already, so maybe more later.
If folks help Lizhi clean it up and we get enough votes to bring it here,
then I won't stand in the way. Let me point out some reasons not to bring
it here for folks to think about:
1) Apache doesn't like "umbrella projects". I don't exactly know why and
haven't dug into it, but apparently there were some umbrella projects in
the past that ran into trouble and the solution was to split the big
project into several projects. Starting up a project is definitely harder
than bringing in code to an existing project, so I understand the
temptation to keep bringing more things under Apache Flex.
2) Scalability: In one vision of a wildly successful future for FlexJS,
we'd ship even fewer SWCs than we do now. The Jquery folks would take
over the Jquery SWCs. They'd export the code from our repos to their
repos and release them on their own schedule. We would remove the code
from our repos. Same for CreateJS, GoogleMaps, etc. IMO, we are only
providing these SWCs for now as a proof of concept. I can't imagine the
amount of list traffic involved if we had one huge monolithic release of
every AS library in the world.
I get what you are saying, but this does not usually happen. Angular,
Typescript etc shims for popular libraries like Highcharts, D3 etc. are
maintained by volunteers who are not affiliated to either the framework or
the library. I believe that is healthy situation.
That said, I think if the version of Starling that Lizhi is developing is
a separate apache project, it would attract the right kind of community.
Just my 2 cents.
Thanks,
Om
And I can't imagine the amount of list
traffic if we had 200 third-party libraries all on their own release
schedule. In short, I would prefer that we build an ecosystem of
third-parties rather than have everyone have to go through our community
in order to release. Even JIRA doesn't really handle categorization of
bugs in a hierarchical fashion.
So, I'm not sure what the right answer is, but we'll discuss it more when
Lizhi's code becomes more ready.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/9/17, 12:58 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I think it would be great to refactor ir and bring it here. Although, I
>have some things on my plate already, so maybe more later.
If folks help Lizhi clean it up and we get enough votes to bring it here,
then I won't stand in the way. Let me point out some reasons not to bring
it here for folks to think about:
1) Apache doesn't like "umbrella projects". I don't exactly know why and
haven't dug into it, but apparently there were some umbrella projects in
the past that ran into trouble and the solution was to split the big
project into several projects. Starting up a project is definitely harder
than bringing in code to an existing project, so I understand the
temptation to keep bringing more things under Apache Flex.
2) Scalability: In one vision of a wildly successful future for FlexJS,
we'd ship even fewer SWCs than we do now. The Jquery folks would take
over the Jquery SWCs. They'd export the code from our repos to their
repos and release them on their own schedule. We would remove the code
from our repos. Same for CreateJS, GoogleMaps, etc. IMO, we are only
providing these SWCs for now as a proof of concept. I can't imagine the
amount of list traffic involved if we had one huge monolithic release of
every AS library in the world. And I can't imagine the amount of list
traffic if we had 200 third-party libraries all on their own release
schedule. In short, I would prefer that we build an ecosystem of
third-parties rather than have everyone have to go through our community
in order to release. Even JIRA doesn't really handle categorization of
bugs in a hierarchical fashion.
So, I'm not sure what the right answer is, but we'll discuss it more when
Lizhi's code becomes more ready.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex,
I think it would be great to refactor ir and bring it here. Although, I
have some things on my plate already, so maybe more later.
Thanks
2017-02-09 0:51 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> Unfortunately, there are IP Issues with Lizhi's code. It isn't ready to
> be part of Apache at this time.
>
> IMO, emulation of the Flash API surface belongs in a different community.
> I'd prefer that our APIs do not have the word "flash" in them and make no
> promise to implement Flash functionality. But if volunteers want to help
> Lizhi clean up his code base, and bring it in here, I only have one vote.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 2/8/17, 2:54 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
> >posted here:
> >
> >https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
> >
> >I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in
> >order
> >to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
> >(gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
> >
> >I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get
> >HTML5/WebGl
> >capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
> >But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial Apache
> >FlexJS
> >
> >Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to
> >develop/maintain
> >it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
> >
> >Makes that sense?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hello Team,
> >> >
> >> >Good Morning!!
> >> >
> >> >Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
> >>
> >> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on
> >>the
> >> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
> >> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will
> >>have
> >> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
> >> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
> >>
> >> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
> >> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
> >> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS
> >>for
> >> compilation.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Carlos Rovira
> >Director General
> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >http://www.avant2.es
> >
> >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> >proceda a su destrucción.
> >
> >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> >comunicamos
> >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> >nuestras
> >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> >necesaria.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Unfortunately, there are IP Issues with Lizhi's code. It isn't ready to
be part of Apache at this time.
IMO, emulation of the Flash API surface belongs in a different community.
I'd prefer that our APIs do not have the word "flash" in them and make no
promise to implement Flash functionality. But if volunteers want to help
Lizhi clean up his code base, and bring it in here, I only have one vote.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 2/8/17, 2:54 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
>posted here:
>
>https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
>
>I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in
>order
>to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
>(gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
>
>I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get
>HTML5/WebGl
>capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
>But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial Apache
>FlexJS
>
>Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to
>develop/maintain
>it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
>
>Makes that sense?
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello Team,
>> >
>> >Good Morning!!
>> >
>> >Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
>>
>> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on
>>the
>> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
>> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will
>>have
>> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
>> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
>>
>> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
>> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
>> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS
>>for
>> compilation.
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Carlos Rovira
>Director General
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.avant2.es
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>proceda a su destrucción.
>
>De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>comunicamos
>que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>nuestras
>oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex,
this is perfect to bring the following question. For the examples Lizhi
posted here:
https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs
I think this code should be a perfect addon to our flexjs codebase in order
to be able to add more graphic capabilities and/or gaming
(gaming is an entire world and I only say to put the basis)
I'm talking about having a SWC library that we could use to get HTML5/WebGl
capabilities as part of a FlexJS application.
But instead of use an external library, have one as part of oficial Apache
FlexJS
Lizhi should have to donate the code and could continue to develop/maintain
it from here, be helped by other people, etc...
Makes that sense?
Thanks
2017-02-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
> On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello Team,
> >
> >Good Morning!!
> >
> >Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
>
> Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on the
> cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
> production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will have
> everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
> volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
>
> That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
> FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
> doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS for
> compilation.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] - Is FlexJS ready for production?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/8/17, 2:37 AM, "Raj Raju" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello Team,
>
>Good Morning!!
>
>Is FlexJS ready for making games for Production?
Hard to say. FlexJS is at the point where we need volunteers to be on the
cutting edge and help us create the missing pieces required to make a
production application. There is very little chance that FlexJS will have
everything you need right out-of-the-box. Apache projects are
volunteer-driven and folks are expected to pitch in on what they need.
That said, there has been very little focus on gaming applications for
FlexJS. FlexJS isn't trying to emulate the Flash Player APIs. Lizhi is
doing something like that, which is a separate project but uses FlexJS for
compilation.
HTH,
-Alex