You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> on 2014/01/17 18:13:31 UTC

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Please vote to release the following artifacts:

http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/

Here is my +1.

--
- Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Simon Willnauer <si...@gmail.com>.

+1

SUCCESS! [1:11:35.695571]

upgrade Elasticsearch to 4.1.6 and all tests pass

simon

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Michael McCandless
<lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732]
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
>>>
>>> Here is my +1.
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Mark
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.

+1

SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732]

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897]
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.

+1

SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897]



On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.

+1 - passing smokeTestRelease

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com

17. jan. 2014 kl. 18:13 skrev Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>:

> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> --
> - Mark

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.

Hi Shawn:

You have to give JAVA_HOME to ant as ENVIRONMENT VARIABLE, e.g. "JAVA_HOME=/.../... ant foobar". This makes the ant shell script (which works behind the "ant" command) to use the specified JVM. This makes the code compile with the specified java version.

The 2 special variables JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME are named a little bit sub-optimal: They are passed as "system properties" and are not interpreted by ant itself. It's used by the build script when executing the smoke tester. More correct would be to pass them not in capital-letters to ANT as system property, like ant -Djava6home=... -Djava7home=..., but its as it is at the moment. JAVA_HOME and the stupid named JAVA6_HOME are two completely different things.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:solr@elyograg.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:02 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
> 
> On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> > If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using
> > Java
> > 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the
> > JAVA_HOME env variable.
> 
> The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25.
>  6u26 is available.  JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set.
> JAVA_HOME was not.
> 
> I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6 is
> required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.

Should have been in my experience, not imo - have had a cold for a week and it’s getting to me.

bq.  it could use the information it's been given about java 6.

I think it’s an Apache Ant thing.

JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME are Lucene smoke tester things.

- Mark

On Jan 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java
>> 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME
>> env variable.
> 
> The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25.
> 6u26 is available.  JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set.  JAVA_HOME
> was not.
> 
> I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6
> is required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.

On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java
> 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME
> env variable.

The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25.
 6u26 is available.  JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set.  JAVA_HOME
was not.

I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6
is required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6.

Thanks,
Shawn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.

Hi Mark,

This problem lets me remember LUCENE-5355: This one affected the “nice” javadocs created after release. I backported the patch, so the one running the “nice looking javadocs” on java 7 with java 6 bootclasspath can be sure, it was really using the correct bootclasspath. Also the documentation howto on the wiki applies only to builds with this patch.

Uwe

-----

Uwe Schindler

H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

 <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmiller@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 12:05 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env variable.

- Mark

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:

On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
> otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.

Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805.  A lot of
people were hit by that one.  I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed
and we could tell people that relief was coming.

I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you
think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that
basket.

-1, please respin.

In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN
checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was
missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a
problem with my setup than the code.  I can obtain the exact error
message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might
be?  I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system.

Thanks,
Shawn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

-- 
- Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.

If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6
rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env
variable.

- Mark


On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
> > otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.
>
> Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805.  A lot of
> people were hit by that one.  I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed
> and we could tell people that relief was coming.
>
> I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you
> think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that
> basket.
>
> -1, please respin.
>
> In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN
> checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was
> missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a
> problem with my setup than the code.  I can obtain the exact error
> message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might
> be?  I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
- Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>.

On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
> otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.

Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805.  A lot of
people were hit by that one.  I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed
and we could tell people that relief was coming.

I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you
think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that
basket.

-1, please respin.

In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN
checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was
missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a
problem with my setup than the code.  I can obtain the exact error
message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might
be?  I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system.

Thanks,
Shawn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.

Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.


On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero@gmail.com
> wrote:

> +1
>
> Run integration tests with:
>  - Hibernate Search
>  - Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene)
>  - Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene)
>
> All perfect, great job!
> (For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved)
>
> Sanne
>
>
> On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590]
> >
> > Changes, docs and javadocs look good.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
> >>
> >> Here is my +1.
> >>
> >> --
> >> - Mark
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
- Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Sanne Grinovero <sa...@gmail.com>.

+1

Run integration tests with:
 - Hibernate Search
 - Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene)
 - Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene)

All perfect, great job!
(For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved)

Sanne


On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590]
>
> Changes, docs and javadocs look good.
>
> Steve
>
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.

+1

Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590]

Changes, docs and javadocs look good.

Steve

On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> --
> - Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org