[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-15386) Camel-Opentelemetry and Camel-opentracing: Semantic conventions are going to diverge

["Ruben Vargas (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17173323#comment-17173323 ] 

Ruben Vargas commented on CAMEL-15386:
--------------------------------------

I'll take a look at this, I will see what options we have.

> Camel-Opentelemetry and Camel-opentracing: Semantic conventions are going to diverge
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-15386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15386
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: camel-opentelemetry, camel-opentracing
>            Reporter: Andrea Cosentino
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> I was trying to update to opentelemetry 0.7 and noticed some breaking changes. It seems the semantic conventions are going change between opentracing and opentelemetry
> [https://github.com/opentracing/specification/blob/1.1/semantic_conventions.md]
> [https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/master/specification/trace/semantic_conventions/database.md#notes-and-well-known-identifiers-for-dbsystem]
> The problem we have is the fact that we are sharing stuff between opentracing and opentelemetry through the camel-tracing component and since they removed the DB_TYPE and DB_INSTANCE, we need to find a different way or a workaround
> [https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java/commit/8525405239173cb8cb6eb4e72cc421b37a8ab2fb]
> [~rubensvp]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)