You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> on 2009/02/15 17:15:20 UTC
use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin used it
to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be done on
models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on Maven 2.1
release plan?
Regards,
Hervé
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@sonatype.com>.
Kool and the gang.
On 17-Feb-09, at 2:49 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> ITs passed without any problem
>
> upgrade done in r745216
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 16 février 2009, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
>> I assume you've tried it with 2.1? If all the same integration tests
>> pass then I don't see any downside.
>>
>> On 15-Feb-09, at 5:52 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>> I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
>>>
>>> bugfixes:
>>> - MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root
>>> element
>>> - MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes
>>> - MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName
>>>
>>> enhancements:
>>> - MODELLO-155: support $version in xml.namespace
>>> - MODELLO-139: add encoding support to CLI
>>> - MODELLO-143: add an option to xdoc to add a separator before a
>>> field
>>> documentation (to have a more readable documentation)
>>> - a lot of model parameters have been renamed/moved for better
>>> consistency
>>>
>>> +:
>>> - keep model in sync with Maven 3.0, when previous enhancements will
>>> be used
>>> - prepare to benefit from future 1.0.1 (MODELLO-179, fixes, ...)
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI, for the moment, thanks to improved unit-tests, there are no
>>> regressions
>>> found in 1.0-alpha-22 or 1.0: the only regressions found by Benjamin
>>> are in
>>> xdoc, for which unit-tests lack asserts (if anybody find a way to
>>> add more
>>> asserts, I'm interested...)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hervé
>>>
>>> [1] http://modello.codehaus.org/release-notes.html
>>>
>>> Le dimanche 15 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
>>>> What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.boutemy@free.fr]
>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
>>>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>>>> Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
>>>>
>>>> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and
>>>> Benjamin used
>>>> it to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>>>>
>>>> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can
>>>> be done
>>>> on models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for
>>>> 2.1.x
>>>> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>>>>
>>>> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
>>>> Maven
>>>> 2.1 release plan?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hervé
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder, Apache Maven
>> jason at sonatype dot com
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> the course of true love never did run smooth ...
>>
>> -- Shakespeare
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------
To do two things at once is to do neither.
-—Publilius Syrus, Roman slave, first century B.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
ITs passed without any problem
upgrade done in r745216
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 16 février 2009, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> I assume you've tried it with 2.1? If all the same integration tests
> pass then I don't see any downside.
>
> On 15-Feb-09, at 5:52 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
> >
> > bugfixes:
> > - MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element
> > - MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes
> > - MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName
> >
> > enhancements:
> > - MODELLO-155: support $version in xml.namespace
> > - MODELLO-139: add encoding support to CLI
> > - MODELLO-143: add an option to xdoc to add a separator before a field
> > documentation (to have a more readable documentation)
> > - a lot of model parameters have been renamed/moved for better
> > consistency
> >
> > +:
> > - keep model in sync with Maven 3.0, when previous enhancements will
> > be used
> > - prepare to benefit from future 1.0.1 (MODELLO-179, fixes, ...)
> >
> >
> > FYI, for the moment, thanks to improved unit-tests, there are no
> > regressions
> > found in 1.0-alpha-22 or 1.0: the only regressions found by Benjamin
> > are in
> > xdoc, for which unit-tests lack asserts (if anybody find a way to
> > add more
> > asserts, I'm interested...)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > [1] http://modello.codehaus.org/release-notes.html
> >
> > Le dimanche 15 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
> >> What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.boutemy@free.fr]
> >> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
> >> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> >> Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
> >>
> >> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and
> >> Benjamin used
> >> it to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
> >>
> >> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can
> >> be done
> >> on models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for
> >> 2.1.x
> >> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
> >>
> >> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
> >> Maven
> >> 2.1 release plan?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hervé
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder, Apache Maven
> jason at sonatype dot com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> the course of true love never did run smooth ...
>
> -- Shakespeare
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@sonatype.com>.
I assume you've tried it with 2.1? If all the same integration tests
pass then I don't see any downside.
On 15-Feb-09, at 5:52 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
>
> bugfixes:
> - MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element
> - MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes
> - MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName
>
> enhancements:
> - MODELLO-155: support $version in xml.namespace
> - MODELLO-139: add encoding support to CLI
> - MODELLO-143: add an option to xdoc to add a separator before a field
> documentation (to have a more readable documentation)
> - a lot of model parameters have been renamed/moved for better
> consistency
>
> +:
> - keep model in sync with Maven 3.0, when previous enhancements will
> be used
> - prepare to benefit from future 1.0.1 (MODELLO-179, fixes, ...)
>
>
> FYI, for the moment, thanks to improved unit-tests, there are no
> regressions
> found in 1.0-alpha-22 or 1.0: the only regressions found by Benjamin
> are in
> xdoc, for which unit-tests lack asserts (if anybody find a way to
> add more
> asserts, I'm interested...)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> [1] http://modello.codehaus.org/release-notes.html
>
> Le dimanche 15 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
>> What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.boutemy@free.fr]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>> Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
>>
>> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and
>> Benjamin used
>> it to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>>
>> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can
>> be done
>> on models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for
>> 2.1.x
>> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>>
>> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
>> Maven
>> 2.1 release plan?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
the course of true love never did run smooth ...
-- Shakespeare
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1]
bugfixes:
- MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element
- MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes
- MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName
enhancements:
- MODELLO-155: support $version in xml.namespace
- MODELLO-139: add encoding support to CLI
- MODELLO-143: add an option to xdoc to add a separator before a field
documentation (to have a more readable documentation)
- a lot of model parameters have been renamed/moved for better consistency
+:
- keep model in sync with Maven 3.0, when previous enhancements will be used
- prepare to benefit from future 1.0.1 (MODELLO-179, fixes, ...)
FYI, for the moment, thanks to improved unit-tests, there are no regressions
found in 1.0-alpha-22 or 1.0: the only regressions found by Benjamin are in
xdoc, for which unit-tests lack asserts (if anybody find a way to add more
asserts, I'm interested...)
Regards,
Hervé
[1] http://modello.codehaus.org/release-notes.html
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
> What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.boutemy@free.fr]
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
>
> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin used
> it to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>
> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be done
> on models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>
> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on Maven
> 2.1 release plan?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading?
-----Original Message-----
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.boutemy@free.fr]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin used it
to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be done on
models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on Maven 2.1
release plan?
Regards,
Hervé
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
I upgraded Archiva trunk to Modello 1.0. We use it extensively for
defining our database model and I've seen no problems with 1.0.
James
On 16/02/2009, at 10:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I'm fine with that, I'd say go ahead and merge the changes across.
> It's easy enough to roll back if there are any problems.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 16/02/2009, at 12:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
>> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and
>> Benjamin used it
>> to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>>
>> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can
>> be done on
>> models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for
>> 2.1.x
>> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>>
>> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
>> Maven 2.1
>> release plan?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I'm fine with that, I'd say go ahead and merge the changes across.
It's easy enough to roll back if there are any problems.
- Brett
On 16/02/2009, at 12:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin
> used it
> to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>
> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be
> done on
> models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>
> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
> Maven 2.1
> release plan?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@sonatype.com>.
On 15-Feb-09, at 11:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and Benjamin
> used it
> to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you).
>
I actually want to use 1.0.1 because of the changes that Igor made to
support incremental builders in Eclipse. So I'll probably update 3.x
to use that instead of 1.0 for what it's worth.
> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can be
> done on
> models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for 2.1.x
> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression.
>
> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on
> Maven 2.1
> release plan?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
believe nothing, no matter where you read it,
or who has said it,
not even if i have said it,
unless it agrees with your own reason
and your own common sense.
-- Buddha
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org