You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org by Changshin Lee <ia...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/05 09:25:52 UTC
Re: VOTE: Move JAXB API to Geronimo
+1 with my note that this movement is focused on JAXB 1.0 for now.
I have to admit that I've spent quite much time considering the
proposal.
Happy new year,
Ias
On Dec 15, 2005, at 9:45 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently discovered, that Geronimo contains a collection of
> J2EE clean room implementations. IMO, it would be better, if we
> offered them to take the jaxmeapi sources and add them to their
> collection.
>
> I see the following disadvantages:
>
> - Being no Geronimo committers, we could no longer maintain the
> sources. But the API
> is mandated to us by an external source (the JAXB SPEC) anyways,
> to which the
> Geronimo developers are bound as well. Besides, the API sources
> have been
> exceptionally stable with only very few and minor changes in the
> last two years.
> - Introduced dependency from an external jar file. (Possibly even
> more, because
> some classes from jaxmeapi are already present in other Geronimo jar
> files, for
> example QName and XMLConstants. But this is the case for Java <=
> 1.4 only.)
> However, we'd dropped the dependency from an internal jar file.
>
> On the other hand, we had the following advantages:
>
> - Smaller project, faster builds
> - Better visibility for the jar file (a real lot of Apache projects
> are still using JAXB
> jar files, even if the API were sufficient)
> - Some projects, which are dependent on JaxMe, are actually
> dependent on the
> jaxmeapi.jar only. They would no longer be dependent from us. In
> other words,
> we'd reduce the pressure of fixing Gump problems.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Dims []
> Ias []
> Jochen [+1]
> Nacho []
> Robert []
>
>
>
> --
> Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> boat. (Mark Twain)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jaxme-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jaxme-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jaxme-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jaxme-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: VOTE: Move JAXB API to Geronimo
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Changshin Lee wrote:
> +1 with my note that this movement is focused on JAXB 1.0 for now.
>
> I have to admit that I've spent quite much time considering the proposal.
In the light of
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113570200300003&r=1&w=2
it is best to defer the proposal anyways. On the other hand, this will
possibly ease your mind.
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jaxme-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jaxme-dev-help@ws.apache.org