You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Krisztian Szucs (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/04/24 18:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (ARROW-15374) [C++][FlightRPC] Add support for alternative MemoryManagers

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Krisztian Szucs updated ARROW-15374:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 8.0.0
                       (was: 7.0.0)

> [C++][FlightRPC] Add support for alternative MemoryManagers
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-15374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15374
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++, FlightRPC
>            Reporter: David Li
>            Assignee: David Li
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 8.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should add support for sending/receiving data using a non-standard allocator, given that:
>  * the plan is to support UCX as a backend to Flight,
>  * UCX can manage non-CPU memory,
>  * the existing Device/MemoryManager API handles this case,
> We should find some way to ensure we fully reflect UCX's capabilities to Flight users. Furthermore, we should integrate the MemoryManager and Flight APIs so that Flight user code should not _have_ to worry about whether their backend supports this or not. (That means that for gRPC, we should do the copy for the user.)
> As part of this, we should extend the Flight benchmark to test this case so we also have a baseline.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)