You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@daffodil.apache.org by "Min Phyo Aung (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/08/04 15:25:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (DAFFODIL-1512) dfdl prefix properties on dfdl annotation elements should generate useful diagnostic

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17393264#comment-17393264 ] 

Min Phyo Aung commented on DAFFODIL-1512:
-----------------------------------------

This issue is resolved. I have added the TDML test to verify it.

commit f3f47975bc3d6c7f144e97c8fc176096e3529b7a

Thank you.

 

> dfdl prefix properties on dfdl annotation elements should generate useful diagnostic
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-1512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1512
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Diagnostics, Front End, Usability
>            Reporter: Mike Beckerle
>            Assignee: Min Phyo Aung
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: beginner
>
> A common mistake is to move short-form annotations with the dfdl: prefix from elements into the dfdl:format annotation. But then one forgets to remove the prefix dfdl: since the attributes of the dfdl:format annotation are not prefixed. So this is an error: {code}
> <dfdl:format dfdl:lengthKind="delimited" ..../>
> {code}
> When what was intended is{code}
> <dfdl:format lengthKind="delimited".... />
> {code}
> Daffodil should issue a specific diagnostic whenever it finds dfdl: prefixed attributes in the annotation elements dfdl:format, dfdl:element, dfdl:simpleType, dfdl:sequence, dfdl:choice, etc. 
> It should point out specifically that the author probably wanted to remove the prefix dfdl:



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)