You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Dale Newfield <Da...@Newfield.org> on 2008/02/13 18:22:06 UTC
Re: [struts] about paramsPrepareParamsStack
GF wrote:
> do you think is there any issue adding <interceptor-ref
> name="staticParams"/> also before the first <interceptor-ref
> name="params"/> in this way:
> <interceptor-ref name="staticParams"/>
> <interceptor-ref name="params"/>
...
> <interceptor-ref name="prepare"/>
...
> <interceptor-ref name="staticParams"/>
> <interceptor-ref name="params"/>
Almost. Really it should be the other way around, since you don't want
user-set parameters to override your static parameters.
And for 2.1.1 you also need: "actionMappingParams"
Which means it should really be:
<interceptor-ref name="params"/>
<interceptor-ref name="actionMappingParams"/>
<interceptor-ref name="staticParams"/>
...
<interceptor-ref name="prepare"/>
...
<interceptor-ref name="params"/>
<interceptor-ref name="actionMappingParams"/>
<interceptor-ref name="staticParams"/>
-Dale
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [struts] about paramsPrepareParamsStack
Posted by GF <ga...@gmail.com>.
> Almost. Really it should be the other way around, since you don't want
> user-set parameters to override your static parameters.
I agree with you.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org