CANCELLED -> Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 4 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

OK.  Backing it out.  Will put up new RC w/o HBASE-1537 in a sec.
St.Ack

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> When this first went in we were making an incompatible branch release already. I think the current situation is pretty close.
>
> However, IMO let's just do this on trunk.
>
> The current very simple approach works for some straightforward cases but I have a dev group reporting some odd behavior that I need to dig into next week. Doing this right may be more complicated.
>
>   - Andy
>
> --- On Sat, 6/19/10, Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 4 as  hbase-0.20.5?
>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 8:59 AM
>> The inclusion of HBASE-1537 changes
>> the Scan serialization format, making
>> clients incompatible with previous 0.20.x releases.
>> Is that ok?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 4 here:
>> >
>> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-4/>
>> >
>> > There have been 24 issues addressed since the release
>> of hbase-0.20.4 [1].
>> >
>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5?
>> >
>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a
>> chance.  Vote closes
>> > Wednesday, June 23rd.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Your HBase Team
>> >
>> > 1. http://su.pr/1prW9y
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>