You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us> on 2010/03/05 05:43:50 UTC
cobertura & jetty
So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't impact the code coverage.
My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing.
The server is started from the test class which would make you think would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the same classpath.
What am I missing?
Douglas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: cobertura & jetty
Posted by Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>.
Well cobertura's graphs in hudson are far superior.
We aren't even specifying a version so we should have had the latest.
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
D/
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> Glad to hear you got things working. Just a note on Cobertura though;
> we are running our cove coverage for unit and container-based
> integration tests with Cobertura so it's not the tool per se. Could
> have been an issue with the version of Cobertura you were using or the
> configuration but if Emma is working for you and you are happy with
> it, I wouldn't switch.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Douglas Ferguson
> <do...@douglasferguson.us> wrote:
>> Actually switching to emma got things working..
>>
>> I just start jetty from the base class of my selenium test.
>> I have a static field that prevents jetty from attempting to start twice.
>>
>> Seems to work great.
>>
>> D/
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:23 PM, hanasaki wrote:
>>
>>> most of what I have found points to using emma to get code coverage in
>>> the integration phase using the failsafe plugin and embedded Jetty.
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: cobertura & jetty
>>> From: Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>
>>> To: Maven Users List <us...@maven.apache.org>
>>> Date: 03/04/2010 10:43 PM
>>>
>>>> So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't
>>>> impact the code coverage.
>>>>
>>>> My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing.
>>>>
>>>> The server is started from the test class which would make you think
>>>> would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the
>>>> same classpath.
>>>>
>>>> What am I missing?
>>>>
>>>> Douglas
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: cobertura & jetty
Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Glad to hear you got things working. Just a note on Cobertura though;
we are running our cove coverage for unit and container-based
integration tests with Cobertura so it's not the tool per se. Could
have been an issue with the version of Cobertura you were using or the
configuration but if Emma is working for you and you are happy with
it, I wouldn't switch.
Kalle
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Douglas Ferguson
<do...@douglasferguson.us> wrote:
> Actually switching to emma got things working..
>
> I just start jetty from the base class of my selenium test.
> I have a static field that prevents jetty from attempting to start twice.
>
> Seems to work great.
>
> D/
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:23 PM, hanasaki wrote:
>
>> most of what I have found points to using emma to get code coverage in
>> the integration phase using the failsafe plugin and embedded Jetty.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: cobertura & jetty
>> From: Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>
>> To: Maven Users List <us...@maven.apache.org>
>> Date: 03/04/2010 10:43 PM
>>
>>> So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't
>>> impact the code coverage.
>>>
>>> My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing.
>>>
>>> The server is started from the test class which would make you think
>>> would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the
>>> same classpath.
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>> Douglas
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: cobertura & jetty
Posted by Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>.
Actually switching to emma got things working..
I just start jetty from the base class of my selenium test.
I have a static field that prevents jetty from attempting to start twice.
Seems to work great.
D/
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:23 PM, hanasaki wrote:
> most of what I have found points to using emma to get code coverage in
> the integration phase using the failsafe plugin and embedded Jetty.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: cobertura & jetty
> From: Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>
> To: Maven Users List <us...@maven.apache.org>
> Date: 03/04/2010 10:43 PM
>
>> So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't
>> impact the code coverage.
>>
>> My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing.
>>
>> The server is started from the test class which would make you think
>> would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the
>> same classpath.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> Douglas
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: cobertura & jetty
Posted by hanasaki <ha...@hanaden.com>.
most of what I have found points to using emma to get code coverage in
the integration phase using the failsafe plugin and embedded Jetty.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: cobertura & jetty
From: Douglas Ferguson <do...@douglasferguson.us>
To: Maven Users List <us...@maven.apache.org>
Date: 03/04/2010 10:43 PM
> So I finally got jetty starting from my test case, but it doesn't
> impact the code coverage.
>
> My BasePage class is at 0% which is confusing.
>
> The server is started from the test class which would make you think
> would be using the instrumented classes and jetty would inherit the
> same classpath.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Douglas
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org