Doc page and bug

[N B <ni...@hotmail.com>]

Hi all,

At work we were looking for a solution to get the scheduled folder shared between two brokers. It failed because I only set the KahaDb persistence adapter. The wiki page does NOT mention the dataFolder of the broker itsself, which is about the scheduled messages part (in which we were interested!!) Please extend this page for other users! http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html    

Furthermore, we've switched from 5.6 to 5.10, and I noticed that I have to set the broker.setDataFolder() before setting the persistenceAdapter (we configure by code). If I do it the other way around, activeMQ ignores the setDataFolder() call completely and uses a local .../scheduler folder anyway...

Best regards,

Niels Gorisse
EIjkelkamp
 		 	   		  

Re: Doc page and bug

[James Green <ja...@gmail.com>]

I've updated the page having found a note from Gary Tully confirming it.
Suggest the api usage matter also reported should become a bug.

On 17 September 2014 13:47, N B <ni...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> At work we were looking for a solution to get the scheduled folder shared
> between two brokers. It failed because I only set the KahaDb persistence
> adapter. The wiki page does NOT mention the dataFolder of the broker
> itsself, which is about the scheduled messages part (in which we were
> interested!!) Please extend this page for other users!
> http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>
> Furthermore, we've switched from 5.6 to 5.10, and I noticed that I have to
> set the broker.setDataFolder() before setting the persistenceAdapter (we
> configure by code). If I do it the other way around, activeMQ ignores the
> setDataFolder() call completely and uses a local .../scheduler folder
> anyway...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Niels Gorisse
> EIjkelkamp
>