You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by ilango_g <il...@yahoo.com> on 2008/10/08 22:46:52 UTC
selecting an open-source JMS implementation
Hi
I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like
WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true?
Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a simple JMS
application implementing queues and a recipient list. If I need to achieve
this, I want to build this using an opn-source product.
Does ActiveMQ fit the bill or is there another open-source JMS
implementation I should be considering?
Eventually I need to provide a stronger implementation based on WebSphere MQ
or WebLogic MQ or whatever.
Please advise
thanks
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/selecting-an-open-source-JMS-implementation-tp19887281p19887281.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: selecting an open-source JMS implementation
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM, ilango_g <il...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like
> WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true?
Yes, ActiveMQ implements the JMS 1.1 spec.
> Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a simple JMS
> application implementing queues and a recipient list. If I need to achieve
> this, I want to build this using an opn-source product.
> Does ActiveMQ fit the bill or is there another open-source JMS
> implementation I should be considering?
You should consider using Apache Camel with ActiveMQ to route messages
using the enterprise integration patterns (EIPs) including the
recipient list:
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/recipient-list.html
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Re: selecting an open-source JMS implementation
Posted by "florin.g" <fl...@bytenotes.com>.
Yes it is. Just start using it.
ilango_g wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like
> WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true?
> Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a simple JMS
> application implementing queues and a recipient list. If I need to achieve
> this, I want to build this using an opn-source product.
> Does ActiveMQ fit the bill or is there another open-source JMS
> implementation I should be considering?
>
> Eventually I need to provide a stronger implementation based on WebSphere
> MQ or WebLogic MQ or whatever.
>
> Please advise
> thanks
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/selecting-an-open-source-JMS-implementation-tp19887281p19888942.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.