You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2013/08/13 14:23:12 UTC
mod_proxy_fcgi and util_fcgi
I intend to update mod_proxy_fcgi to use util_fcgi "soon". IIUC Jim and/or
Daniel R. have been testing/fixing AF_UNIX stuff with mod_proxy_fcgi and it
might be disruptive to do that right now. (And Jim is largely off-line
this week so he probably won't comment on that.)
The FastCGI definitions/helpers used by mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.4.x are
private, so I don't believe there's any concern for mod_proxy_fcgi using
util_fcgi in that branch.
And hopefully mod_authnz_fcgi will follow before long, after successfully
testing with an authorizer that was previously used with Zeus and relied on
some authorizer protocol features that had not been implemented by
mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgid.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and util_fcgi
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> I'm back from vaca and plan on folding in my UDS stuff this week...
>
cool/thanks!
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I intend to update mod_proxy_fcgi to use util_fcgi "soon". IIUC Jim
> and/or Daniel R. have been testing/fixing AF_UNIX stuff with mod_proxy_fcgi
> and it might be disruptive to do that right now. (And Jim is largely
> off-line this week so he probably won't comment on that.)
> >
> > The FastCGI definitions/helpers used by mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.4.x are
> private, so I don't believe there's any concern for mod_proxy_fcgi using
> util_fcgi in that branch.
> >
> > And hopefully mod_authnz_fcgi will follow before long, after
> successfully testing with an authorizer that was previously used with Zeus
> and relied on some authorizer protocol features that had not been
> implemented by mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgid.
> > --
> > Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> > http://emptyhammock.com/
>
>
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and util_fcgi
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'm back from vaca and plan on folding in my UDS stuff this week...
On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to update mod_proxy_fcgi to use util_fcgi "soon". IIUC Jim and/or Daniel R. have been testing/fixing AF_UNIX stuff with mod_proxy_fcgi and it might be disruptive to do that right now. (And Jim is largely off-line this week so he probably won't comment on that.)
>
> The FastCGI definitions/helpers used by mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.4.x are private, so I don't believe there's any concern for mod_proxy_fcgi using util_fcgi in that branch.
>
> And hopefully mod_authnz_fcgi will follow before long, after successfully testing with an authorizer that was previously used with Zeus and relied on some authorizer protocol features that had not been implemented by mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgid.
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> http://emptyhammock.com/